Result. The term of the Agreement as extended is not further extended, and expires on the fifth anniversary of the Commencement Date.
Result. The term of the Agreement is not extended, and expires on the third anniversary of the Commencement Date. Example 3:
Result. Indicator 6: Increase the percentage of degree/certificate-seeking, non-college-ready students who complete their program and/or are retained for the next academic year Description: We identified our non-college-ready group based upon math placement scores. We used placement scores that would place students into either Tech Math with Review or below. Our goal is to increase the percentage of degree/certificate-seeking, non-college-ready students who complete their program and/or are retained for the next academic year. Result: Wichita State University Campus of Applied Sciences and Technology Bridge Performance Agreement AY 2020 and AY 2021 AY 2018 FTE: 3,047 Date: 10/23/2019 Contact Person:Xxxxx Xxxxx Phone: 316-677-9535email: xxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx Foresight Goal 3 yr. History Reporting AY 2020 (SU19, FA19, SP20) Reporting AY 2021 (SU20, FA20, SP21) Institution Result Baseline Comparison Institution Result Baseline Comparison 1 Increase number of certificates and degrees awarded 1 KBOR data AY 2013: 869 AY 2014: 1,085 AY 2015: 1,153 Baseline: 1,036 2 Increase the number of graduates in programs identified as high wage, high demand occupations in our region of Kansas 2 AY 2016: 146 AY 2017: 192 AY 2018: 305 Baseline: 214 3 Increase number of third party 2 AY 2013: 827 technical credentials earned AY 2014: 857 AY 2015: 880 Baseline: 855 4 Increase the percentage of students 1 AY 2013: 646/1,004 = 64.3% who complete developmental AY 2014: 731/1,130 = 64.7% Reading, English, or Math courses AY 2015: 340/612 = 55.6% with a grade of “C” or higher Baseline: 1,717/2,746 = 62.5% 5 Increase number of Hispanic/Latino 1 AY 2013: 432 students enrolled in post-secondary AY 2014: 548 education AY 2015: 577 Baseline: 519 6 Increase percent of high school 1 AY 2013: 601/663 = 90.6% students successfully completing AY 2014: 1,456/1,624 = 89.7% courses AY 2015: 1,988/2,166 = 91.8% Baseline: 4,045/4,453 = 90.8% Wichita State University Campus of Applied Sciences and Technology Bridge Performance Agreement AY 2020 and AY 2021 Indicator 1: Increase number of certificates and degrees awarded Description: WSU Tech will increase the number of students earning a certificate or an associate degree award. WSU Tech will focus on increasing the number of students who earn certificate/degrees by improving completion rates of programs through targeting specific retention/completion efforts for identified programs. The strategy includes improving communications and processes between faculty...
Result. The PFI or Servicer must obtain and maintain fidelity insurance in its own name for at least $3.5 million with a maximum deductible of $300,000, in addition to the coverage maintained by the parent organization.
Result. The system will display the completed record(s) on the list
Result. Effective as of the second anniversary of the Commencement Date, the term of the Agreement is extended 12 months, so that it will expire on the fourth anniversary of the Commencement Date unless further extended in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2 of the Agreement.
Result. Under §§ 1.1503(d)–1(b)(4)(i)(A) and 1.367(a)–6T(g)(1), P’s Country X perma- nent establishment constitutes a foreign branch separate unit. Therefore, the year 1 loss attributable to the foreign branch sepa- rate unit constitutes a dual consolidated loss pursuant to § 1.1503(d)–1(b)(5)(ii). The dual consolidated loss rules apply to the dual con- solidated loss even though there is no affil- iate of the foreign branch separate unit in Country X, because it is still possible that all or a portion of the dual consolidated loss can be put to a foreign use. For example, there may be a foreign use with respect to a Country X affiliate acquired in a year subse- quent to the year in which the dual xxxxxxx- dated loss was incurred. See § 1.1503(d)– 6(a)(2). Accordingly, unless an exception under § 1.1503(d)–6 applies (such as a domestic use election), the year 1 dual consolidated loss attributable to P’s Country X perma- nent establishment is subject to the domes- tic use limitation rule of § 1.1503(d)–4(b). As a result, pursuant to § 1.1503(d)–4(c), the year 1 dual consolidated loss cannot offset income of P that is not attributable to its Country X foreign branch separate unit, nor can it offset income of any other domestic affiliate. The loss can, however, offset income of the Country X foreign branch separate unit, sub- ject to the application of § 1.1503(d)–4(c). The result would be the same even if Country X did not have a consolidation regime that in- cludes as members of consolidated groups Country X branches or permanent establish- ments of nonresident corporations. The dual consolidated loss rules apply even in the ab- sence of a consolidation regime in the for- eign country because it is possible that all or a portion of a dual consolidated loss can be put to a foreign use by other means, such as through a sale, merger, or similar trans- action. See § 1.1503(d)–6(a)(2).
Result. Under § 1.1503(d)–1(b)(4)(i)(A), P’s and S’s shares of FBX owned indirectly through their interests in PRSX are indi- vidual foreign branch separate units. Pursu- ant to § 1.1503(b)–1(b)(4)(ii), these individual separate units are combined and treated as a single separate unit of the consolidated group of which P is the parent. Unless an ex- ception under § 1.1503(d)–6 applies, any dual consolidated loss attributable to FBX cannot offset income of P or S (other than income attributable to FBX, subject to the applica- tion of § 1.1503(d)–4(c)), including their dis- tributive share of the U.S. source income earned through their interests in PRSX, nor can it offset income of any other domestic affiliates.
Result. Under § 1.1503(d)–1(b)(4)(i)(B), the partnership interests in HPSX held by P and S are individual hybrid entity separate units. These individual separate units are combined into a single separate unit under § 1.1503(d)–1(b)(4)(ii). In addition, P’s and S’s share of the Country Y operations owned in- directly through their interests in HPSX are individual foreign branch separate units under § 1.1503(d)–1(b)(4)(i)(B). These indi- vidual separate units are also combined into a single separate unit under § 1.1503(d)– 1(b)(4)(ii). Unless an exception under § 1.1503(d)–6 applies, dual consolidated losses attributable to P’s and S’s combined inter- ests in HPSX can only be used to offset in- come attributable to their combined inter- ests in HPSX (other than income attributable to P’s and S’s combined interests in the Country Y foreign branch separate unit), subject to the application of § 1.1503(d)–4(c). Similarly, dual consolidated losses attrib- utable to P’s and S’s combined interests in the Country Y operations of HPSX can only be used to offset income attributable to their combined interests in such Country Y oper- ations, subject to the application of § 1.1503(d)–4(c). Neither FSX’s interest in HPSX, nor its share of the Country Y oper- ations owned by HPSX, is a separate unit be- cause FSX is not a domestic corporation.
Result. The $100x loss attributable to P’s interest in DE1X is available to, and in fact does, offset FSX’s income under the laws of Country X. In addition, under U.S. tax principles, such income is considered to be an item of FSX, a foreign corporation. As a result, under § 1.1503(d)–3(a), there has been a foreign use of the year 1 dual consolidated loss attributable to P’s interest in DE1X. Therefore, P cannot make a domestic use election with respect to the loss as provided under § 1.1503(d)–6(d)(2), and such loss will be subject to the domestic use limitation rule of § 1.1503(d)–4(b). The result would be the same even if FSX, under Country X tax law, had no income against which the dual con- solidated loss of DE1X could be offset (unless FSX’s ability to use the loss under Country X tax law requires an election, and no such election is made).
