Rating structure. The rating structure presented here serves as a model. (1) A rating of Meets Expectations will be demonstrated by successfully meeting the normal performance standards of the position description. The faculty member’s performance includes a combination of the following: a sufficient level of organization and planning to complete assigned activities by deadlines with some direction from the supervisor, and responsiveness to library users. Service and research/creative/scholarly activities reflect the commitment to the University community, engagement in professional development, and participation in the broader professional community outside of the university. (2) A rating of Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the normal minimum performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (3) A rating of Far Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the expectations for those rated Exceeds Expectations. (4) A rating of Below Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member failing to meet the normal minimal performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (5) A rating of Unsatisfactory will be demonstrated by a faculty member engaging in practices that are detrimental to supporting student and faculty success. There is evidence that the faculty member lacks the competence to perform the requirements of the job description and remediation is unsuccessful. Service and research/creative/scholarly activities reflect little to no engagement in the university or professional community.
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement