Ramifications. Failing to correct the member's certification/licensure deficiency and/or attain "highly qualified" status under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 within the period of administrative leave (not later than August 15th of the following year), may be grounds for termination under section 3319.16 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Ramifications. The Resident Educator Summative Assessment (RESA) shall be administered during the third (3rd) or fourth (4th) year of teaching. Passage of the assessment results in eligibility for the professional educator license. In the event a Resident Educator fails the assessment, the Resident Educator will be subject to OAC 3301-24-04(D). ARTICLE XXIII PROGESSIVE DISCIPLINE/EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
Ramifications. Except as specifically herein amended, all terms, provisions, conditions and exhibits contained in the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. Any terms used in this Second Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same definition as in the Lease. In the event that any provision of this Second Amendment shall conflict with the terms, provisions, conditions and exhibits of the Lease, the terms, provisions, conditions and exhibits of this Second Amendment shall govern and control. All references in the Lease to "this Lease", "herein" or terms of similar import shall refer to the Lease as amended hereby and as the same may be hereafter amended.
Ramifications. Any areas, internal or external, in need of cleaning, repair, or replacement, because of the Member/User’s usage will be repaired, cleaned, or replaced at the sole expense of the Member/User. Any charges incurred for cleaning, repair, replacement, or otherwise for the non-compliance or violation of the rules, shall be collected by the Member/User by any of the following means: - Deduction or forfeiture of the Security Deposit; - Collected from the Member/User; - Billed against the Member’s annual Association dues paid to Homeland Village Community Homeowners Association; - Montgomery County small claims court or higher court, if necessary.
Ramifications. Our technique is based on the premise that a discrete abstraction can be found and used to reason about the continuous co-simulation model. For the railways case study, this is indeed so: the only potential safety hazard occurs when a signal changes from green to red and a moving train is present on the track controlled by that signal. Violation of safety in the continuous model can occur if the train is moving too fast and located too close to the signal at the moment when the signal change takes place. A proof that the above scenario cannot arise in the concrete physical train model is an issue for refinement, which introduces the continuous train state and behaviour. Proofs about that model profit from our semantics of con- tinuous and hybrid behaviours in Modelica in terms of the hybrid relational calculus (HRC) [19]. We have mechanised that calculus in Isabelle/UTP too, using the Multivariate Analysis and HOL-ODE theory libraries [24]. More specifically, to verify that trains do not overrun red signals, we impose a maximum speed threshold on trains; this also reflects real-world requirements of railways traffic. Since all signals are red initially, and any change of a signal from green to red only takes place once an initial track has been vacated (no new trains arrive in our scenario), for correct refinement we merely have to establish that a train can halt in time on its first track. A proof of this has been mechanised in Isabelle/UTP too, and is reported in one of our publications [42]. It makes use of restrictions on the length of the initial track segments and maximum speed of trains. The above confirms the conceptual viability of our verification technique. They can be done compositionally, not having to consider the continuous behaviour of the entire FMI co-simulation. Another point to consider is soundness. This is, for instance, important for certification evidence. The only place where unsound proofs can enter our verification approach is through Isabelle axiomatisations and the use of the eval tactic, though the latter is less likely to cause real issues since this tactic is part of Isabelle/HOL itself and tested by a large community of users. Nonetheless, we have made an effort to mitigate both potential sources of inconsistency. First, by proposing a sound definitional schema (Fig. 10) in the one place where an axiomatizaion is required, and, secondly, by verifying the result of our external C++ algorithm for closure computation, rather...
Ramifications. Except as specifically herein amended, all terms, ------------- provisions, conditions and exhibits contained in the Initial Lease are hereby confirmed, ratified and restated and shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. In the event that any provision of this Second Amendment shall conflict with the terms, provisions, conditions, and exhibits of the Initial Lease, the terms, provisions, conditions and exhibits of this Second Amendment shall govern and control.
Ramifications. Any areas, internal or external, in need of cleaning, repair, or replacement, as a result of the Member/User’s usage will be repaired, cleaned, or replaced at the sole expense of the Member/User. Any charges incurred for cleaning, repair, replacement, or otherwise for the non- compliance or violation of the rules, shall be collected by the Member/User by any of the following means: - Deduction or forfeiture of the Security Deposit; - Collected from the Member/User; - Billed against the Member’s annual Association dues paid to Westphalia Row Homeowners Association; - Prince George’s County small claims court or higher court, if necessary.
