R representation Clause Samples

R representation. The computation of the likelihood of the target node is performed in two steps. We start by computing the likelihood contributions for each incoming branch. Then we aggregate all likelihood contributions. For each branch, its likelihood contribution is obtained by multiplying the likelihood of the source node with the conditional likelihood that an occurrence of the source node will lead to the target node. Figure 26 shows an example of a fragment of an R script corresponding to the CORAS fragment in Figure 16. Figure 26 R fragment representing incoming 'leads-to' relations Here, the aggregation of the likelihood contributions from S1 and S2 to S3 is defined by simple addition. This is, however, not the only way to do it, as further explained below.
View Source
R representation. Figure 29 shows an R fragment used to trigger a proposal for implementing mitigation M1. Figure 29 R fragment for triggering a mitigation proposal This is done by assigning M1 a Boolean value, i.e. either TRUE or FALSE. If the value is TRUE, it means that the system should propose M1 as a mitigation option (possibly one among many). As also stated in Section 7.5.2, this should only be done if the following holds: 1) At least one risk that M1 has the potential to reduce is sufficiently high to warrant the proposal, and 2) the contribution to this risk from the branch to which M1 is attached is sufficiently high that a reduction of this contribution can significantly reduce the risk level. According to Figure 22, the only risk that M1 has the potential to reduce is the risk of incident U1 harming asset A1. In the script fragment of Figure 29, the risk level of this risk is represented by R1, which is an interval. The script fragment consists of a single if-then-else statement, where the first conjunct of the conditional corresponds to condition 1) above, and the second conjunct corresponds to condition 2). Notice that the 'sufficiently high' criterion is captured by the thresholds K1 and K2, as explained by the comments in the script fragment. To ensure a precautionary approach, these thresholds are compared to the worst case (maximum) elements of the interval sets.
View Source
R representation. Figure 28 shows an example of assignment of conditional likelihood to a 'leads-to' relation based on indicators. Figure 28 R fragment for assignment of conditional likelihood based on indicators The example is similar to the one for assignment of likelihood to a node in Section 8.3.2, and the assumption made for the indicators there apply also here. Typically, the indicators attached to a 'leads-to' relation will relate to the presence and/or severity of vulnerabilities on the relation. The main difference between the script fragments in Figure 27 and Figure 28 is that the latter assigns a probability interval rather than a frequency interval; hence, all numbers are between 0 and 1. Regarding the difficulty of providing general guidelines and the importance of the validation, the same considerations as expressed in Section 8.3.2 apply also when assigning a conditional likelihood on a 'leads-to' relation.
View Source
R representation. The risk level is determined by the likelihood of the incident in question and its consequence for the relevant asset. We assume that the consequence value, as well as the likelihood, is given as an interval. A common and simple way of defining the risk level function is to multiply the likelihood with the consequence. Figure 25 shows a fragment of an R script for doing this. Figure 25 R fragment representing a simple risk level calculation
View Source
R representation. The Chapter recognizes its responsibility as ba represent all employees in the bargaining untietr. , wheth Wherever the male gender is used in this Agreement, i males and females equally.
View Source
R representation. Figure 27 shows an example of likelihood assignment to a node based on indicators. Figure 27 R fragment for assignment of node likelihood based on indicators Two indicators are used in this example: I1 and I2. Both are Boolean and defined such that TRUE indicates a higher likelihood of the threat scenario than FALSE. Therefore, the highest likelihood is assigned to the node S1 if both indicators are TRUE, and the lowest if they are both false. Due to the wide range of potential threat scenarios and indicators, it is very hard to give general advice on how to define the node likelihood from a set of attached indicators. We therefore recommend that such issues receive a bit of extra attention in the validation of the algorithm.
View Source

Related to R representation

  • Fair Representation MSEA-SEIU acknowledges its statutory responsibility to represent and handle grievances for all employees within the bargaining unit. The State shall not be responsible for actions taken or not taken by MSEA-SEIU with respect to its responsibility to provide fair representation.

  • 10b-5 Representation At the time of effectiveness of the Registration Statement (or at the time of any post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement) and at all times subsequent thereto up to the Closing Date and the Option Closing Date, if any, the Registration Statement, the Statutory Prospectus and the Prospectus do and will contain all material statements that are required to be stated therein in accordance with the Act and the Regulations, and did or will, in all material respects, conform to the requirements of the Act and the Regulations. The Registration Statement, as of the Effective Date and at the Applicable Time, did not, and the amendments and supplements thereto, as of their respective dates, will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. The Prospectus, as of its date and the Closing Date or the Option Closing Date, as the case may be, did not, and the amendments and supplements thereto, as of their respective dates, will not, include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The Statutory Prospectus, as of the Applicable Time (or such subsequent Applicable Time pursuant to Section 2.1.1), did not include any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. When any Preliminary Prospectus or the Statutory Prospectus was first filed with the Commission (whether filed as part of the Registration Statement for the registration of the Public Securities or any amendment thereto or pursuant to Rule 424(a) of the Regulations) and when any amendment thereof or supplement thereto was first filed with the Commission, such Preliminary Prospectus or the Statutory Prospectus and any amendments thereof and supplements thereto complied or will have been corrected in the Statutory Prospectus and the Prospectus to comply in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the Act and the Regulations and did not and will not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The representation and warranty made in this Section 2.2.1 does not apply to statements made or statements omitted in reliance upon and in conformity with written information furnished to the Company with respect to the Underwriters by the Underwriters expressly for use in the Registration Statement, the Statutory Prospectus or the Prospectus or any amendment thereof or supplement thereto. The parties acknowledge and agree that such information provided by or on behalf of the Underwriters consists solely of the following: the names of the Underwriters, the information with respect to stabilization transactions contained in the section entitled “Underwriting - Stabilization” and the identity of counsel to the Underwriters contained in the section entitled “Legal Matters” (such information, collectively, the “Underwriters’ Information”).

  • Seller Representations Seller represents and warrants to Purchaser as follows: (a) Seller owns all Purchased Notes free and clear of all liens, pledges, encumbrances, security agreements, equities, options, claims, charges and restrictions of any nature whatsoever, except any restrictions under applicable state and federal securities laws, and has not previously entered into any commitment for the sale of all or part of such Purchased Notes or otherwise conveyed or encumbered Seller’s interest with respect to the Purchased Notes. (b) Seller has full power and authority to sell and transfer the Purchased Notes to Purchaser without obtaining the waiver, consent, order or approval of (i) except as has otherwise been obtained or as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, Amicus International, (ii) any state or federal governmental authority, or (iii) any third party or other person. (c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Seller and the performance by Seller of his, her, or its obligations pursuant to this Agreement will not result in any material violation of, or materially conflict with, or constitute a material default under, any agreement to which Seller is a party or such Seller’s charter documents, nor, to such Seller’s knowledge, result in the creation of any material mortgage, pledge, lien, encumbrance or charge upon any of the Purchased Notes, other than pursuant to this Agreement. (d) Upon delivery of and payment for the Purchased Notes as herein contemplated, Seller will convey to Purchaser good, valid and marketable title to the Purchased Notes free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, equities, options, claims, charges and restrictions, of any nature whatsoever, other than restrictions under applicable securities laws. (e) Seller has reviewed with Seller’s own tax advisors the federal, state and local tax consequences of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Seller is not relying on any statements or representations of Purchaser or any of its agents. Seller understands that Seller shall be solely responsible for Seller’s own tax liability that may arise as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Buyer Representations Buyer represents and warrants to Seller as follows:

  • Your Representations You represent to the Company that you have read and fully understand this Agreement and the Plan and that your decision to participate in the Plan is completely voluntary. You also acknowledge that you are relying solely on your own advisors regarding the tax consequences of the Award.