Proposal Exclusions Sample Clauses
The Proposal Exclusions clause defines specific items, services, or responsibilities that are not included within the scope of a proposal. In practice, this clause lists out what the proposing party will not provide or cover, such as certain materials, third-party costs, or work outside a defined scope. By clearly outlining these exclusions, the clause helps prevent misunderstandings and disputes by ensuring both parties have a mutual understanding of the proposal's limitations and boundaries.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Proposal Exclusions. Permits (Except for SWPPP NOI and ADEQ Dust Permit which is included).
Proposal Exclusions. It is MEP’s understanding that the following items are not currently requested, applicable, or expected to be provided by the commissioning team. Should TFC determine that additional scope related to these items would be required, the additional scope would be considered additional services.
1. Pre-design and design phase commissioning support services, including commissioning agent review of A/E designs and participation in A/E design review meetings, is not included.
2. Commissioning of mechanical, electrical, or plumbing equipment not otherwise listed above (including but not limited to lighting controls and miscellaneous plumbing fixtures) is not included. DocuSign Envelope ID: 171BBBAF-7B4F-48BB-A38A-17554A568810
3. In accordance with customary, industry-standard commissioning guidelines, all other construction phase activities not otherwise identified above are not included and are assumed to be the responsibility of Others (A/E, Owner, TAB Agent, General Contractor or Subcontractors).
4. Development of design drawings and/or specifications is not included.
5. Development of independent opinion of probable construction costs is not included.
6. Performance of independent energy modeling and/or independent HVAC load calculations is not included.
Proposal Exclusions. It is CONSULTANT’s understanding that the following items are not currently requested, applicable, or expected to be provided by the design team. Should TFC determine that additional scope related to these items would be required as part of the assessment deliverables, the additional scope may be considered as additional services.
Proposal Exclusions. It is MEP’s understanding that the following items are not currently requested, applicable, or expected to be provided by the commissioning team. Should TFC determine that additional scope related to these items would be required, the additional scope would be considered additional services.
1. Pre-design and design phase commissioning support services, including commissioning agent review of A/E designs and participation in A/E design review meetings, is not included.
2. Due to the remote project site and anticipated staggered schedule for equipment startups, MEP will not observe equipment start-ups and initial system operations tests. Performance of these steps shall remain the responsibility of the General Contractor. All equipment startup reports and test summaries shall be provided to the CxA by the GC for review and for Cx documentation purposes.
3. Commissioning of mechanical, electrical, or plumbing equipment not otherwise listed above (including but not limited to lighting controls and miscellaneous plumbing fixtures) is not included.
4. In accordance with customary, industry-standard commissioning guidelines, all other construction phase activities not otherwise identified above are not included and are assumed to be the responsibility of Others (A/E, Owner, TAB Agent, General Contractor or Subcontractors).
5. Development of design drawings and/or specifications is not included.
6. Development of independent opinion of probable construction costs is not included.
7. Performance of independent energy modeling and/or independent HVAC load calculations is not included.
Proposal Exclusions. It is MEP’s understanding that the following items are not currently requested, applicable, or expected to be provided by the design team. Should TFC determine that additional scope related to these items would be required as part of the assessment deliverables, the additional scope may be considered as additional services.
1. As noted within the FAC, the A/E team assumes that the existing smoke control equipment and systems serving the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (RDM) building are operable and in serviceable condition. MEP recommends that TFC engage a qualified, third-party TAB contractor to test the smoke control systems to confirm functionality and compliance with City of Austin Fire Department requirements. MEP’s fire protection subconsultant will witness the third-party testing as part of the above scope of work; however, any additional engineering calculation, analysis and/or redesign required to address new deficiencies uncovered by the third-party testing is excluded. If required, such additional engineering scope of work can be performed by the A/E team as additional services.
2. Except as specifically addressed in the project scope of work above, we exclude design and construction administration phase services related to the following items: hazardous materials, environmental impact, data, public address systems, furniture/fixtures/equipment, plumbing fixture counts, extensive energy calculations/energy modeling, formal life cycle cost (LCC) analysis, landscaping, site utilities, zoning services, permitting, certification of roof level anchor points, and testing/laboratory services.
3. We exclude the engagement of third-party service technicians in a subconsultant capacity to provide MEP with access to, and/or facilitate inspection of, existing building systems including HVAC building automation systems, elevator controls systems, and fire alarm systems. MEP includes assessment of these system in its scope, but we include no fee allowance for service technician time and materials.
4. Unless noted otherwise, it is presumed that existing conditions within the various buildings are functional and compliant with applicable codes, such that additional design scope related to unknown existing conditions is not anticipated to be required.
5. Performance of formal energy modeling is not included. Basic energy efficiency and payback comparisons involving magnitude of costs, life expectancies, and informal life-cycle cost comparisons are included. In the event that...
