Project Monitoring and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Project Monitoring and Evaluation. 13. The Borrower shall:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient shall:
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Annual Work Plans and Budgets
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. 6.1 The Recipient will be required to co-operate with the provision of information and evidence to support the monitoring and evaluation of the delivery of the Project against outputs and outcomes agreed by the Funder, including participation on a telephone, web or face to face interview to review the impact of the Grant and the Project for the Recipient. The Recipient will report to the Funder on the progress of the Project on a monthly basis by completing the Project Update Dashboard.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. (a) The Borrower shall monitor and evaluate on an ongoing basis, in accordance with the indicators (the Project Monitoring Indicators) set forth in the Annex to this Schedule 5, the carrying out of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient shall, no later than one (1) month after the Effective Date, appoint an agency satisfactory to the Association and under terms of reference satisfactory to the Association, for purposes of establishment of baselines for measurement under the indicators set forth in Section II.A.1 (b) of this Schedule.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. (a) The Borrower shall through SFD maintain policies and procedures adequate to enable it to monitor and evaluate on an ongoing basis, in accordance with the indicators (the Project Monitoring Indicators) set forth in the Annex to this Schedule 4, the carrying out of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Strengthening of the monitoring and evaluation capacity of the National Coordination Unit, particularly to use geographic information system-based data and prepare cartographic material on Rural Development Communities participating in the Project. SCHEDULE 2 Project Execution
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Monitoring and evaluating Project implementation, and strengthening the monitoring and evaluations capacity of DTE, the BTEB and the BMET, through the provision of the technical assistance required therefore. SCHEDULE 2
Project Monitoring and Evaluation. This project will maintain the capacity to implement the red swamp crayfish response plan developed by MDNR and MSU. The outcomes of this project will also inform future invasive crayfish control work that can be used throughout the country. The ideal outcome is eradication at infested locations in Michigan. If eradication efforts are not successful, we expect drastically reduced red swamp crayfish populations that are at densities low enough that negative impacts would be negligible. An additional goal of this project is to increase knowledge of crayfish and control effectiveness that will allow us to develop more effective strategies in future iterations of the adaptive management process. Metrics for Goals 1 & 2 For these goals, the primary metric is the proportion of sites in the high-risk zone (i.e., 10km from known infestations) that are occupied. In order to estimate this quantity, we will also continue to estimate the effectiveness of trapping in detecting crayfish, if present. We will build upon pre-existing model frameworks to estimate the proportion of sites occupied and detection probability via occupancy modeling. The conceptual basis for this analysis is that repeated sampling (e.g., using multiple traps within a water body) allows one to estimate the probability that a single unit of sampling will detect red swamp crayfish when present. This probability can then be used, along with sampling from a random sample of water bodies to determine which water bodies are occupied, and the aggregate probability of having sites where red swamp crayfish were present, but not detected. Products of this sampling and analysis will be a map of known red swamp crayfish distribution within the high risk zone, an estimate of the number of sites where red swamp crayfish is likely to be but was not detected, and an estimate of the capacity of sampling methods to detect red swamp crayfish. From this information, we will also be able to provide evidence-based recommendations for an effective sampling plan for red swamp crayfish. Metrics for Goal 3 There is currently little known about red swamp crayfish life history in Michigan, and northern climates in general. Trapping efforts in 2019 have incorporated novel gear types to increase captures of juvenile and egg-bearing females. Based on the results from the 2019 season, we will continue to address this knowledge gap by evaluating several metrics focused on the reproductive cycle of red swamp to align our study wit...
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.