PROJECT INTEGRATION Clause Samples

PROJECT INTEGRATION. Project management and control, communications and stakeholder involvement, legal and financial planning, and project interface management will be performed under this task.

PROJECT INTEGRATION. Project management and control, communications and stakeholder involvement, legal and financial planning, and project interface management will be performed under this task. Project Management and Controls This task includes project management, project controls, preparing and submitting the Phase III – DPA, and project reporting. These activities will be used to provide oversight and control throughout Phase II. Sub-award management and technology transfer functions will also be performed under this task. The Alliance utilizes earned value management techniques meeting industry standards for tracking completion of work, keeping activities on schedule, and controlling costs to remain within the budget. The Alliance implements and manages the project and reports on activities in accordance with the approved PMP, which is revised throughout the phases of the project. The Alliance prepares and submits reports and deliverables as required in the Financial Assistance Reporting Requirements Checklist and this SOPO. The PMP has been revised to reflect changes identified during Phase I activities. A copy of this plan is included in the Phase II – DPA. The Alliance will incorporate any additional DOE comments and provide DOE a revised PMP within 60 days of the Phase II start date specified in the Cooperative Agreement. A Technology Cost Data Report for the CO2 pipeline and storage site will be provided to DOE at the end of Phase II. Based on the costs of CO2 compression/pumping, delivery, injection, geologic storage, and MVA, the Alliance will provide to DOE the capital and operating costs (estimated, including percent accuracy, and actual when available) and the total project cost. The costs of any other technologies used in the project will be included in this reporting. The cost data to be provided by the Alliance will include (but not necessarily be limited to): • Project budget broken down by work breakdown structure (WBS) levels, i.e., budgeted and actual costs at the deliverable level, rolled up to the subtask level, task, phase, and total project. The total project budget will include personnel (direct labor), fringe rate, travel, equipment, supplies, sub-recipients (or subcontractors), consultants, other direct costs, and indirect costs (e.g., overhead, general and administrative). • Capital and operating cost breakdown (excluding project management and reporting costs) and other costs including project equipment and material costs, capital costs, and opera...

PROJECT INTEGRATION. (a) It is the intention of the parties hereto that when the Wanapum Development is constructed, its operation shall be integrated with the operation of the Priest Rapids Development as required by said Public Law 544 and said Federal Power Commission License for the Project. It is agreed that all benefits accruing to the Project as a result of such integration shall be shared equally by the Priest Rapids and Wanapum Developments. It is also agreed that all joint costs of the Priest Rapids and Wanapum Developments shall be equitably allocated between them and that such allocation shall be reviewed by the Advisory Committee as provided in Section 13 hereof. In the event compensation becomes due the owners of the Rock Island Hydroelectric Project, in accordance with that certain agreement dated the 8th day of August, 1955 between Puget Sound Power and Light Company, Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, and Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County (a conformed copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference) because of encroachment on the Rock Island Project, such compensation, if in power and energy, will proportionately reduce the amount of power and energy to be available to Purchaser under Section 3 herein, but shall not reduce the amount required to be paid by Purchaser under Section 5 herein. (b) The parties hereto agree that if operation of the Priest Rapids Development with the maximum controlled headwater level of 486.5 feet above mean sea level (determined by reference to the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Sea Level Datum of 1929 with supplemental additions of 1947) causes encroachment on the tailwater of the Wanapum Development, located at or upstream from the location shown on the License application drawings which were filed with the Federal Power Commission by the District on June 27, 1955 (approximately mile 415 on the Columbia River), the Priest Rapids Development shall compensate the Wanapum Development in kind and coincidentally for one-half (1/2) of the loss to the Wanapum Development of capacity and power output. The Priest Rapids Development shall compensate the Wanapum Development in kind and coincidentally for all loss of capacity and power output at the Wanapum Development caused by controlled headwater levels above said level of 486.5 feet at the Priest Rapids Development. If the Wanapum Development is located downstream from the location shown on the said License applicatio...