Problem Context Sample Clauses

Problem Context. The special purpose processors in embedded systems are highly optimized to perform their application-specific computations in a fast and area- and energy-efficient way. The design of those processors is becoming increasingly challenging due to increas- ing application complexity, the ever-increasing demand for computational power, and worldwide time-to-market pressure. To satisfy the demand for computational power, Multi-Processor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) solutions are deployed in modern embedded systems. Such MPSoCs consist of many different components such as programmable processing components, specialized processing components, memory components, and input/output interfaces. By letting multiple components work in parallel, the demand for computational power is met. Unfortunately, the design of an MPSoC is even more challenging than the design of a single-processor system. The challenge for the designer is to distribute computations over different processors of the MPSoC. While doing so, the designer should guarantee functional correctness of the system and at the same time make tradeoffs between orthogonal design aspects such as circuit area and performance [Mar06]. Thus, the shift to multi-processor sys- tems may address the demand for computational power, but this comes at the expense of a further increase in design complexity. Traditionally, processors have been designed at the Register Transfer Level (RTL). An RTL specification of a processor consists of registers that are interconnected by signals and combinational logic. RTL design of modern MPSoCs is becoming in- creasingly error-prone and time-consuming because of the abundance of registers, signals, and combinational logic needed for a modern MPSoC’s functionality. To cope with the design complexity of modern MPSoCs, the designer needs to work at a level of abstraction above the RTL. This has led to the emergence of Elec- tronic System-Level (ESL) design methodologies [GAGS09, BM10]. In such a design methodology, the designer first specifies a system at a high level of abstraction. Next, the designer constructs an RTL implementation from the initial specification with the aid of system-level design automation tools. 1. Daedalus enables a designer to obtain a deployable gate-level specification from a system-level specification in a fully automated way. The functional behavior of the system-level specification is specified as a sequential C program, as shown at the upper right part of Figure 1. 1....
Problem Context. A characterisation protocol was developed to acknowledge the quality segregation of single garbage bags with packaging waste. It pretends to evaluate the quality of the material sorted in origin by each individual participant. The process has been developed manually which is endurable for a pilot scale, however, unable to be scaled up to a real context due to the amount of waste commonly generated. In response to this inconsistency. In order to face this challenge the following solution is proposed. actions were proposed to the PlastiCircle project:

Related to Problem Context

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 8.2.1 If Reconex chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, Reconex’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by Reconex to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center subtends as identified in the LERG. 8.2.2 Reconex shall establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks pursuant to applicable access Tariffs by which it will provide Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic to and from Reconex’s Customers. 8.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be two-way trunks. Such trunks shall connect the End Office Reconex utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access to its Customers in a given LATA to the Tandem Verizon utilizes to provide Exchange Access in such LATA. 8.2.4 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access to allow Reconex’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier which is connected to a Verizon access tandem.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Unbundled Network Elements 35.4.1. The charges that CLEC shall pay to Sprint for Unbundled Network Elements are set forth in Table One of this Agreement. 35.5. Collocation 35.5.1. The charges that CLEC shall pay to Sprint for Collocation are set forth in Table Two of this Agreement. 35.6. Call Related Databases 6.1. The charges that CLEC shall pay to Sprint for Call Related Databases purchased pursuant to Part J are set forth in Table One of this Agreement.

  • Customer Content You own and reserve all right, title and interest in your Customer Content. By sending Customer Content to a Hosted Service, you grant us a worldwide, royalty free, non-exclusive license to access and use the Customer Content for purposes of providing you the Hosted Service.