PhD Dissertation Clause Samples
The "PhD Dissertation" clause defines the requirements and expectations regarding the preparation, submission, and evaluation of a doctoral candidate's dissertation. Typically, this clause outlines the standards for originality, formatting, and the process for review and defense before a committee. It may also specify deadlines, procedures for revisions, and criteria for acceptance. The core function of this clause is to ensure that the dissertation meets academic standards and institutional requirements, thereby providing a clear framework for both candidates and evaluators throughout the doctoral process.
PhD Dissertation. Allen, H. L. (2020). Factor structure of the Jordan Performance Appraisal System: A multilevel, multi-group study using categorical and count data. PhD dissertation. Pfleger, P.I. (2020). Designing software to unify person-fit assessment. PhD dissertation. Jones, B.L. (2021). A psychometric analysis of the Precalculus Concept Assessment. PhD dissertation. Simpson, D.M. (2021). The problem of missing data and the Conover solution in state-level data. PhD dissertation.
PhD Dissertation. Harvard Univer- sity. ZHANG, Zhan 2019. ‘Sogdians in Khotan.’ The Silk Road Journal, 16 [2018], 30–43. ZIEME, Peter 1997. ‘“Silk” and “Wad” in Old Turkish Terminology. A Case of Ex- change on the Silk Roads and Beyond.’ Türk Dilleri Araştirmalari, 7, 149–155. Chapter 3 treated the etymology of two Niya Prakrit words which seem to have originated in Greek but must have been borrowed via a Bactrian intermediary, i.e. ks̄.una ‘date, reign, regnal year’ (§3.2.1 s.v.) and the measure of weight milima (§3.2.2 s.v.).973 For five other Greek loanwords in Niya Prakrit, a Bactrian intermediary cannot be proved. Their etymology is briefly examined in this appendix.974 1. khi, a unit of measure Attestations of the base form DIR.SG. khi:975 CKD 2 (10x); 108 (8x); 131; 142; 151; 154 (2x); 167 (5x); 196, etc. INS.SG. khiyena: CKD 580 DIR.PL. khi: CKD 25; 60 (2x); 67 (2x); 76 (7x); 89; 93 (20x); 94 (4x); 98; 104; 108 (khi[y](*e)?): CKD 656 khi is a frequently attested measure in the Niya documents, mainly but not exclusively used for weighing corn and wine. In CKD 465, twenty khi is shown to equal one milima, a ratio confirmed by CKD 108, where 43 khi of corn correspond to two milima and three khi (cf. KD: 341; 363). A few scholars have compared khi to the Khotanese measure kha (e.g. Bailey 1946: 767; Yoshida 2008: 106 fn. 21). 976 Yet, this comparison is doubtful, as kha has been argued to be a Tibetan loanword (Emmerick 1985: 973 In §3.2.4 s.v., I additionally rejected the derivation of kilme ‘household’ from Gr. κλίμα ‘slope of a mountain, (large) region’ on semantic grounds. 974 Personal names of Greek origin are conspicuously absent from the Niya documents (Baums 2018c: 43 fn. 2; 2023: 115 fn. 1). For a detailed study of the Greek political offices attested in Gāndhārī inscriptions, see Candotti & Giudice (2024). 975 For the attestations of khi, I adopt the same principle as for the related unit of measurement milima (§3.2.2 s.v.): instances followed by the numeral signs “1” and “½” are classified as dir.sg., and the remaining ones (also debatable cases) as dir.pl. 976 The same unit of measurement may also be attested in Tumshuqese (cf. Ogihara & Ching 2024: 310 fn. 27). 301f.), in which case the word would have been adopted too late into Khotanese for it to be relevant for Niya Prakrit. Burrow (1935b: 669; LKD: 86 s.v.) made a more attractive comparison with the Greek unit of measurement χοῦς. This etymology is supported by the fact that the related measure milima ca...
PhD Dissertation. University of Washington.
PhD Dissertation. The University of Michigan, ▇▇▇ Arbor.
PhD Dissertation. Goldsmiths College. Doğantan-▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2011). In the beginning was gesture: piano touch and the phenomenology of the performing body. In ▇. ▇▇▇▇ & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (eds), New Perspectives on Music and Gesture (pp. 243–265). Aldershot: Ashgate. Doğantan-▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2015). The Role of the Musical Instrument in Performance as Research: the piano as a research tool. In M. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ (ed), Artistic Practice as Research in Music: Theory, Criticism, Practice (pp. 169-202). Aldershot: Ashgate. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1979). What computers can’t do: the limits of artificial intelligence. New York: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & Row. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1967). The Hidden Order Of Art. Berkeley: University of California Press. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1988). ▇▇▇▇▇▇ as Seen by his Pupils. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2006). How music moves: musical parameters and listeners’ perceptions of motion. Music Perception 23(3), 221-247. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (ed) (2000) ▇▇▇▇▇▇: Etiudy. Warsaw: Fundacja Wydania Narogowego : Polskie Wydawn. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2004). Sollertinskii and dialogical symphonism. In C. Brandist, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, G. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (eds), The Bakhtin Circle (pp. 167-185). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
PhD Dissertation. Tours. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. 2018. Why relative verbs agree with their head noun in many Bantu languages. Presentation at Syntax of the World’s Languages 8， Paris. ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. 2019. Nominal morphology and syntax. In M. O. ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. Nurse and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (eds.), The Bantu Languages (Second Edition), 237-269. London: Routledge. ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. 2021. The Bantu relative agreement cycle. Linguist- ics 59 (4): 981-1015. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Jenneke. 2009. Word order and Information Structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT). ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Jenneke. 2011. Focus excluding alternatives: Conjoint/disjoint marking in Makhuwa. Lingua, 121 (11): 1734-1750.
PhD Dissertation. Harvard University. PALUNČIĆ, Filip, Daniela PALUNČIĆ and Sunil (B.T.) MAHARAJ 2023. ‘Revisiting the Bactrian and Gāndhārī Bilingual Inscriptions from Dasht-e Nāwūr.’ IIJ, 66, 333–383. PANAINO, Antonio 2003. ‘The baγān of the Fratarakas: Gods or ‘Divine’ Kings?’ In Carlo G. Cereti, Mauro Maggi and Elio Provasi (eds.), Religious Themes and Texts of Pre-Islamic Iran and Central Asia. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 265–288. PARPOLA, Asko 2019. ‘The Mirror in Vedic India: Its Ancient Use and Its Present Relevance in Dating Texts.’ Studia Orientalia Electronica, 7, 1–29. PAT-EL, Na’ama 2013. ‘Contact or Inheritance? Criteria for Distinguishing Inter- nal and External Change in Genetically Related Languages.’ JLC, 6, 313–328.
PhD Dissertation. Tilburg University.
PhD Dissertation. Sydney: The University of New South Wales. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2005. L’islam de marché: l’autre révolution concervatrice. Paris: Seuil. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2011. An Islam of Her Own: Reconsidering Religion and Secularism in Women’s Islamic Movements. New York and London: New York University Press. ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2009. Reconfiguring Islamic Tradition: Reform, Rationality, and ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 1994. “The Tongan Tradition of Going to the Movies”. Visual Anthropology Review, 10 (1): 103-111.
PhD Dissertation. Leiden University.