Performance Over Time Sample Clauses

Performance Over Time. ‌ In order to show the performance of a release mechanism as a user moves over time, including how ∆X changes, how often drift happens and how accurate is the perturbed location, we first run a set of experiments for a single test trajectory with popular M learned from all users. We selected a random test trajectory from Geolife dataset consisting of 500 timestamps. We tested both PIM and LM at each timestamp with ϵ = 1 and δ = 0.01. Each method was run 20 times and the average is reported. Figure 3.4a shows the original trajectory in map and state (grid) coordinates; Figures 3.4b and 3.4c show the released (perturbed) locations at each timestamp. We can see that the released locations of PIM is closer to the true location, compared with LM. Size of ∆X. From Figure 3.4d we see that the size of ∆X does not increase dramatically, instead it maintains at stable level after a few timestamps. The reason is that by selecting the δ-location set the inference mechanism only boost probabilities of locations in ∆X. Then the probabilities of other locations decay gradually. Thus a stable δ-location set can be maintained.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Over Time. ‌ At each timestamp, the (smoothed) DoP and Error are shown in Figure 4.10. As expected, Jtrs provides the strongest protection of privacy, while JutiL and DPLS DPMM−G util DPMM−G trs DPLS DPMM−G util DPMM−G trs 120 80 100 80 DoP 60 40 20 0 DPLS DPMM−G util DPMM−G trs 20 40 60 80 100 Timestamp
Sample 1

Related to Performance Over Time

  • Performance Delay Time is of the essence in the Vendor’s performance of this Agreement. If at any time it appears to Vendor that it may not meet any of the performance schedules or the scheduled completion date of the services to be performed for any reason, including labor disputes, Vendor shall immediately by verbal means (to be confirmed in writing) notify Customer of the reasons for and the estimated duration of such delay. If requested by Customer, Vendor shall make every effort to avoid or minimize the delay to the maximum extent possible including the expenditure of premium time. Any additional cost caused by these requirements of Customer shall be borne by Vendor, unless the delay in performance arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Vendor or its subcontractors within the meaning of the Cancellation- Default clause herein. The foregoing requirements are in addition to any of Customer’s other rights and remedies as may be provided by law or this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • PERFORMANCE PERIOD This Agreement shall be performed during the period which begins Oct 01 2020 and ends Sep 30 2022. All services under this Agreement must be rendered within this performance period, unless directly specified under a written change or extension provisioned under Article 14, which shall be fully executed by both parties to this Agreement.

  • Employee Performance Review When a formal review of an employee’s performance is made, the employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to discuss, sign and make written comments on the review form in question and the employee is to receive a signed copy to indicate that its contents have been read. An employee shall be entitled to a minimum of two (2) work days to review the performance review prior to providing any response to the Employer, verbally or in writing, with respect to the evaluation.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Performance Orders A Performance Order:

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND EMPLOYEE FILES 39.01 For the purpose of this Article,

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.