Performance and Accountability Clause Samples

Performance and Accountability. 2.7.1. The parties are agreed that robust and appropriate performance management and individual accountability are essential and that systems to monitor these have made an important contribution thus far to the modernisation of the public service. 2.7.2. Compliance with this Agreement requires that appropriate performance management systems must be fully implemented in those sectors where they do not currently exist by 1 January 2019.

Performance and Accountability. Contractor will meet or exceed all negotiated performance outcomes under this agreement, including WIOA Performance Measures, supplemental grant program goals, and locally developed system measures. a. Negotiated State Performance Outcomes for the 2017-2018 Program Year are: Adults Dislocated Workers Employment Rate 2nd Quarter After Exit 61% 63% Employment Rate 4th Quarter After Exit 55% 58% Median Earnings 2nd Quarter After Exit $4300 $6600 Credential Attainment within 4 Quarters After Exit 52.9% 52.9% b. Negotiated enrollment, exit and carry-forward goals for the 2017- 2018 Program Year are: ADULT DISLOCATED WORKER New Enrolled Clients 13 32 Total Enrolled Clients 44 45 Exited Participants 20 21 Individualized Career Service 44 45 Training Services 9 15 Entered Employment 15 6 Training Related 0 0 Remained with Layoff Employer 0 0 Enter Advanced Training 0 0 Entered Postsecondary Ed 0 0 Entered Apprenticeship 0 0 Entered Military Service 0 0 Exited for Other Reasons 5 5 8. Marketing and Outreach Contractor will coordinate outreach and marketing efforts for the One-Stop Career Center System including career services and training, partner services, and services provided by other WANB contractors in the One- Stop Career Center System. Contractor will conduct all marketing and outreach efforts in accordance with WANB’s approved marketing policies.

Performance and Accountability. Contractor will meet or exceed all negotiated performance outcomes under this agreement, including WIOA Performance Measures, supplemental grant program goals, and locally developed system measures. a. Negotiated State Performance Outcomes for the 2018-2019 Program Year are: Employment Rate 2nd Quarter After Exit 65% 68% Employment Rate 4th Quarter After Exit 62% 65% Median $5,700 $7,500 Credential Attainment Rate 53% 57% Measurable Skills Gain 50% 50% b. Negotiated enrollment, exit and carry-forward goals for the 2018- 2019 Program Year are: Carried in from PY 17-18 28 2 New Enrolled Clients 41 28 Total Enrolled Clients 69 30 Exited Participants 30 2 Individualized Career Service 69 30 Training Services 51 5 Newly Enrolled Training Services 20 3 Entered Employment 20 2 Training Related 15 1 Remained with Layoff Employer 0 Exited for Other Reasons 10 1

Performance and Accountability. (1) In general

Performance and Accountability. The Director must keep the workforce motivated to pursue excellence. The Director is expected to set high standards for performance and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ a climate in which all employees strive to meet those standards. He is also expected to see that supervisors provide regular positive reinforcement to recognize excellence. He must demonstrate expertise in management techniques that effectively hold employees accountable.

Performance and Accountability. 5.1.1 The Charter Operator and Charter School’s performance shall be evaluated in conformity with the academic, financial, organizational standards set forth in the Mississippi Charter School Performance Framework (“Performance Framework”), which is hereby made a part of the charter school contract by reference. For purposes of contract renewal, and revocation decisions, and other evaluations of the Charter School’s performance, the Authorizer will rely primarily on the performance standards set forth in the Performance Framework. The specific terms, form and requirements of the Performance Framework may be modified or amended to the extent required to align with changes to applicable state or federal accountability requirements, as set forth in law. In the event that any such modifications or amendments are required, the Authorizer will use best efforts to apply expectations for school performance in a manner consistent with those set forth in the Performance Framework as initially established in the Charter. The Charter Operator acknowledges that the performance standards set forth in the Performance Framework are subject to change throughout the term of the Agreement, and agrees to be evaluated by standards in the Performance Framework at the time of the evaluation. The Authorizer will give timely notice to the Charter Operator and Charter School upon a change, amendment, or other modification to the Performance Framework. 5.1.2 The Mississippi Charter School Performance Framework shall supersede and replace any and all assessment measures, educational goals and objectives, financial operations metrics, and organizational performance metrics set forth in the application and not explicitly incorporated into the Performance Framework. The specific terms, form, and requirements of the The Mississippi Charter School Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets required by applicable state and federal accountability requirements, are determined by the Authorizer and are binding on the Charter Operator. 5.1.3 The Charter Operator shall be subject to a review of the School and its Academic, Organizational and Financial Performance in relation to the indicators, metrics, and targets set forth in the Performance Framework at least annually and shall provide the basis upon which the Authorizer will decide whether to renew the School’s Charter at the end of the Charter term. 5.1.4 Annual performance targets must be set ...