PANEL DECISION Sample Clauses
PANEL DECISION. The Appeals Panel makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and enters the following decision pursuant to section 10 of the Appeal Guidelines:
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following:
(a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows:
(1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material.
(2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation.
(3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties.
(b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because:
(1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment;
(2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position;
(3) Of other reason (state reason). The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment.
(c) The Panel denies the appeal.
PANEL DECISION. On December 5, 2012,
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following:
(a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows:
(1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material.
(2) The Chief HRO/designee may convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. The Chief HRO/designee shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties.
(b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because:
(1) existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment;
(2) the organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position;
(3) other reason (state reason).
(4) The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment.
(c) The Panel denies the appeal.
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following:
(a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows:
(1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material.
(2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation.
(3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties.
(b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because:
(1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment;
(2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position;
(3) Of other reason (state reason).
(c) The Panel denies the appeal.
PANEL DECISION. [REDACTED] makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and enters the following decision pursuant to section 10 of the Appeal Guidelines:
PANEL DECISION. RESPONDENT
PANEL DECISION. There are 5 potential outcomes from an individual panel meeting, the case may be Approved Declined Deferred (often as a result of inadequate information) Referred to an alternative forum e.g. medicines management Require consideration as service development through the Investment / Disinvestment Process The outcome of the IFR meeting will be conveyed to the referring clinician and patient’s GP together with the patient within 5 working days of the meeting and advice provided regarding what steps could be taken if they, or their patient, are unhappy with the outcome. The referring clinician will be requested as standard to discuss the outcome of the case with the patient in a face to face meeting. If the clinician or patient is unhappy with the Panel decision they have two options open to them.