Overarching Methodology Sample Clauses

Overarching Methodology. The purpose of the analysis of projects is two-fold. On the one hand, WaterDiss2.0 seeks to help each project improve their dissemination and achieve uptake if they need and request it. On the other hand, WaterDiss2.0 seeks to gather and synthesize information about dissemination experiences to inform best practice and contribute to general knowledge and guidance. In order to respond to these specific needs, both questionnaires and interviews were conducted. While the questionnaire gathered statistical data and information about the project characteristics, the interviews served to delve deeper into the issues addressed in the questionnaire and expand on facilitators and barriers of uptake. The quantitative data from the questionnaires is used to create statistical information, which may highlight causal determination, enable prediction, and allow for generalized findings. The qualitative information serves to illuminate the projectsspecific achievements and needs more closely, xxxxxx understanding and enable extrapolation to similar situations (Golafshani, 2003). The premise that qualitative research is not able to give a completely detached account, due to the personal involvement of the researcher should be kept in mind (Xxxxxxxxx 2002). However, to ensure good quality of the qualitative research, project partners were provided an interview guide containing key questions and indicators and a list of influential determinants of dissemination and uptake success. Detailed interview minutes were provided by the project partners as well as a filled-in copy of the aforementioned list highlighting which barriers were relevant to a project. Finally, the project partners were asked to write-up their personal experiences and opinions about the project, the communication with the contact person and their impressions on dissemination and uptake of project results. This three-fold approach maximizes the transparency of the interview process and addresses the difficulty of having several project partners conduct interviews (Popay et al, 1998). The reliability and validity of data was ensured during the planning stage of the analysis and is being revised through the first analysis in this deliverable. Reliability of data questions whether the result of the study is replicable. Some findings from the analysis are related to specific cases and will not be replicable due to unique characteristics of the projects. However, the study of several FP6 and FP7 projects allow...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Overarching Methodology

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C.1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Billing Method 1.5.1 To receive payment for services rendered under this contract, the Contractor shall submit a fully completed invoice for work previously performed to: Minneapolis Public Housing Authority Attention: Accounts Payable, Suite 307 0000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx X, Xxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 or: xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Accounting Methods Implement or adopt any material change in its accounting principles, practices or methods, other than as may be required by GAAP or any Governmental Entity.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx 8 Choice of Law clauses with TIPS Members If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. 9

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Cost for Service and Charge Methodology – POS to The NWSA Service Area and Department (Acct if appropriate) Service Item (from list above) Method of Charges1 Basis for Charge Hourly Rate, Fixed Percentage or Formula 2021 Budgeted Amount2 Commission Office Dept #1200 3.a Fixed Based upon agreed amount of $250,000 per year. $250,000

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.