Operations Plans Clause Samples
The Operations Plans clause outlines the requirements and procedures for creating, submitting, and updating detailed plans that govern how operations will be conducted under an agreement. Typically, this clause specifies the format, timing, and approval process for these plans, and may require parties to collaborate on revisions or updates as circumstances change. By establishing clear expectations for operational planning, the clause ensures that all parties are aligned on how activities will be managed, reducing misunderstandings and facilitating smooth project execution.
Operations Plans. Contractor must adhere to the Transition Plan included as Exhibit 5, 2548 Customer Service Plan included as Exhibit 7, and Collection Service Operations Plan included as Exhibit 8 2549 that present the specific collection and processing programs that will be implemented in the City. 2550 Article 21. Emergency Service
Operations Plans. I It shall participate in fact-finding missions to be conducted in preparation for missions I involving the deployment and employment of the Brigade.
Operations Plans. Contractor must adhere to the Operations Plans attached as Exhibits 13 – 15 that present the specific collection and processing programs that will be implemented in the City.
Operations Plans. The evacuation traffic model used herein is appropriate for planning and comparison purposes and would provide 1 This memorandum was prepared with technical input regarding fire behavior from ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ fire protection planning team. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ⬩ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ⬩ ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ useful information to agencies and emergency managers regarding evacuation timeframes for purposes of informing managers’ issuance of specific evacuation orders. For that reason, it will be provided to agencies and emergency managers; however, during a wildfire, residents should comply with directives from authorities and first responders conducting the evacuation or emergency response, not rely on this evacuation traffic model. This technical memorandum and associated analysis was performed in accordance with the guidance and information provided in the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Fire Hazard Planning Technical Advisory, and the California Office of the Attorney General Best Practices for Analyzing and Mitigating Wildfire Impacts of Development Projects Under CEQA (AG Guidance), for the determination of evacuation times. The roadway network and vehicle input assumptions have been selected to simulate a “worst-case” evacuation scenario that would occur in the nighttime when all Alternative I residents and the surrounding community are at home when ordered to evacuate. This “worst-case” evaluation is not required by CEQA; indeed, CEQA requires the application of reasonable standards and criteria only. Nonetheless, this preparer imposed a “worst-case” evaluation out of an abundance of caution. In an actual wildfire event, it is likely that fewer residents would be present onsite. While other evacuation scenarios are also possible, such as evacuation during morning or evening peak traffic hours, during those hours, however, residents are likely to be away from their respective homes, thus they are likely already out of the evacuation area. Similarly, although the Project site includes an elementary school, residents may not be home when an evacuation order is issued, depending on the time of the emergency. In such scenarios, school personnel would implement the Comprehensive School Safety Plan (CSSP), as required by the California Education Code. This plan outlines procedures for various situations, establishes a chain of command (including roles like incident commander, safety officer, and student release and accountability...
Operations Plans. Golder prepares annual fill sequence and erosion control plans for the refuse placement operations prior to and during winter. Plans addressed winter tipping pad locations and refuse placement areas based on consideration of the maximum desired dozer push distance, accessibility, and overall site drainage during the winter. These plans have been performed on an annual basis since 1999. Team: ▇▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P.E.; ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P.E.; ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P.E. Fresno County retained Golder to provide CQA services for Phase III, Modules 4, 5, and 6 base liner construction. Modules 4, 5, and 6 totaled approximately 48 acres. The base liner is comprised of a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) overlain by a HDPE geomembrane overlain by a geocomposite with a geonet core. The geonet is used as the leachate collection layer. Golder provided CQA services, collected geosynthetic samples for testing in Golder’s GSI-accredited geosynthetics testing laboratory, performed field testing, documented all construction and CQA activities, and prepared a construction report at the end of the project. Golder also obtained geosynthetic samples for conformance testing at the manufacture’r plants. A significant number of GCL conformance samples did not meet all the material specifications; although the contractor elected to ship many of the rolls to the site in advance of the conformance testing. Golder identified the rolls that did not meet the specifications and had the contractor set them aside. The rolls were ultimately shipped back to the manufacturer. Because of Golder’s reputation in providing CQA services and its GSI- accredited geosynthetics testing laboratory, the GCL manufacturer took back the GCL rolls without argument. Golder is also currently under contract to provide review of the County’s design of Phase III, Modules 7 and 8 and subsequently provide CQA services in the summer of 2017.