Offer Selection Sample Clauses

Offer Selection. Using the evaluation criteria described above, PG&E ranked the offers from highest to lowest NMV per Unit. PG&E then selected offers with the highest rank to obtain a portfolio meeting the following 2017 DRAM objectives: (1) not exceeding the service account limit PG&E currently expects to be able to support under Rule 24 in late 2016/early 2017, consistent with Ordering Paragraph 11 of the Resolution; (2) procuring at least 10 MW capacity, of which at least 20% of the MW is residential bids, per the Resolution; and, (3) not exceeding the $6 million budget cap, per the Resolution. With respect to the Rule 24 service account evaluation criteria, Intermediate Implementation of Rule 24 in D.▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ authorized a cumulative total of 40,000 registrations, and 200,000 Customer Information Service Request for Demand Response Providers (“CISR-DRPs”) by no later than March 17, 2017. PG&E started its Intermediate Implementation effort immediately upon issuance of D. ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, and estimated that prior to March 17, 2017, it would be able to support an additional 20,000 Rule 24 registrations, beyond the approximately 5,000 registrations Advice 4880-E - 6 - July 22, 2016 that are already in use for the 2016 DRAM.4 Therefore, the Rule 24 service account limit used for the 2017 DRAM selection of winning offers was set at 20,000. An additional explanation on the selection process is contained in Confidential Appendix B, “Valuation Process Summary” and in Section d of Confidential Appendix C, “2017 DRAM Evaluation Metrics.”

Offer Selection. Using the evaluation criteria described above, PG&E selected Wheelabrator as the offer that would meet the 34 MW requirement at the lowest overall cost to customers as compared to other offers. A more detailed description of the selection and execution process is contained in Confidential Appendix B.