Objection to Sub-processors Sample Clauses
The Objection to Sub-processors clause allows a party, typically the data controller, to formally object to the appointment or use of certain sub-processors by the data processor. In practice, this clause requires the processor to notify the controller before engaging new sub-processors, giving the controller an opportunity to review and, if necessary, raise concerns or refuse consent based on specific criteria such as data security or compliance risks. Its core function is to give the controller oversight and control over who handles their data, thereby mitigating risks associated with unauthorized or unsuitable third-party access.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 38 times
Objection to Sub-processors. Buyer may object prior to HireVue's appointment or replacement of a Sub-processor provided such objection is based on reasonable grounds relating to data protection. In such event, the parties shall cooperate in good faith to reach a resolution and if such resolution cannot be reached, then HireVue, at its discretion, will either not appoint or replace the Sub-processor; if neither of the foregoing are feasible, then Buyer may suspend provision of Personal Data to HireVue).
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object prior to Sprout Social's appointment or replacement of a Sub-processor provided such objection is based on reasonable grounds relating to data protection. In such event, the parties shall cooperate in good faith to reach a resolution and if such resolution cannot be reached, then Sprout Social, at its discretion, will either not appoint or replace the Sub-processor or, will permit Customer to suspend or terminate the affected Sprout Social Service (without prejudice to any fees incurred by Customer prior to suspension or termination).
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to ▇▇▇▇’s appointment of a new Sub-processor on reasonable grounds relating to data protection by notifying Flow promptly in writing within five (5) calendar days of receipt of Flow's notice in accordance with Section 3.3. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In such event, the parties shall discuss such concerns in good faith with a view to achieving commercially reasonable resolution. If this is not possible, either party may terminate the applicable Services that cannot be provided by Flow without the use of the objected-to-new Sub-processor.
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to the appointment of an additional Sub-processor within five (5) calendar days after receipt of TurnTo's notice in accordance with the mechanism set out at Section 8.1 above. In the event that Customer objects on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of the Personal Data, then the parties shall discuss commercially reasonable alternative solutions in good faith. If no resolution can be reached, TurnTo will, at its sole discretion, either not appoint Sub-processor, or permit Customer to suspend or terminate the affected TurnTo service in accordance with the termination provisions of the Agreement.
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to the appointment of an additional Sub- processor within five (5) calendar days after receipt of FreeBusy's notice in accordance with the mechanism set out at Section 8.1 above. In the event that Customer objects on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of the Personal Data, then the parties shall discuss commercially reasonable alternative solutions in good faith. If no resolution can be reached, FreeBusy will, at its sole discretion, either not appoint Sub- processor, or permit Customer to suspend or terminate the affected FreeBusy service in accordance with the termination provisions of the Agreement, before the new Sub-processor shall be authorized to process Customer Personal Data. For the avoidance of doubt, if Agreement is terminated under this Section 8.2. any unused or prepaid fees will not be refunded.
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to SWE’s appointment of a new Sub- processor on reasonable grounds relating to data protection by notifying SWE promptly in writing within five (5) calendar days of receipt of SWE 's notice in accordance with Section
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to FastComet’s appointment of a new Sub-processor on reasonable grounds relating to data protection by notifying FastComet promptly in writing within five (5) calendar days of receipt of FastComet’s notice in accordance with Section 4.3. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In such event, the parties shall discuss such concerns in good faith with a view to achieving commercially reasonable resolution. If this is not possible, either party may terminate the applicable Services that cannot be provided by FastComet without the use of the objected-to-new Sub-processor.
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to the appointment of an additional Sub-processor within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of Teamup's notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in section 8.1 above. In the event that Customer objects on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of the Personal Data, then the parties shall discuss commercially reasonable alternative solutions in good faith. If no resolution can be reached, Teamup will, at its sole discretion, either not appoint Sub-processor, or permit Customer to suspend or terminate the affected Teamup service in accordance with the termination provisions of the ToS.
Objection to Sub-processors. Customer may object in writing to cloudbit’s appointment of a new Sub-processor on reasonable grounds relating to data protection by notifying cloudbit promptly in writing within five (5) calendar days of receipt of cloudbit's notice in accordance with Section 3.3. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In such event, the parties shall discuss such concerns in good faith with a view to achieving commercially reasonable resolution. If this is not possible, either party may terminate the applicable Services that cannot be provided by cloudbit without the use of the objected-to-new Sub-processor.
Objection to Sub-processors. Client may object in writing, stating Client’s reasonable grounds for the objection, to the appointment of an additional Sub-processor within five (5) calendar days after receipt of DV’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out at Section 8.1 above. In the event that Client objects on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of the Personal Data, then the parties shall discuss commercially reasonable alternative solutions in good faith. If no resolution can be reached, DV will, at its sole discretion, either not appoint such Sub-processor, or permit Client to suspend or terminate the Solutions in accordance with the termination provisions of the Agreement. In the event that Client suspends or terminates the Solutions in accordance with the preceding sentence, Client shall immediately pay all fees and costs then owing and all fees and costs incurred by DV as a result of the termination.