Objection Right for Sub-Processors Sample Clauses
The Objection Right for Sub-processors clause grants one party, typically the data controller, the ability to object to the appointment or replacement of sub-processors by the data processor. In practice, this means that before a processor engages a new sub-processor to handle personal data, they must notify the controller, who then has a specified period to raise any objections based on legitimate grounds such as data security or compliance concerns. This clause serves to protect the controller’s interests by ensuring oversight and control over which third parties may access or process sensitive data, thereby mitigating risks related to data privacy and regulatory compliance.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Wiz offers a mechanism for Customers to subscribe to notifications of changes to Wiz’s Sub- Processor List via ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/sub-processor-list. If Customer subscribes to receive such updates, Wiz shall provide notification of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other Sub-Processor(s) to the email address which has subscribed thereby giving Customer the opportunity to object. Customer may reasonably object to ▇▇▇’s use of a Sub-Processor for reasons related to the Data Protection Laws by notifying Wiz in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of Wiz’s notice including the reasons for objecting to Wiz’s use of such Sub-Processor. Failure to object to such Sub-Processor in writing within ten (10) days following Wiz’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the Sub-Processor. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a Sub-Processor, Wiz will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Personal Data by the objected-to Sub-Processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Wiz is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the Agreement and this DPA by providing written notice to Wiz provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date shall be duly paid to Wiz. Until a decision is made regarding the Sub-Processor, Wiz may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Customer Personal Data.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Customer may reasonably object to Strigo's use of a certain Sub-processor (e.g., if making Personal Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or weaken the protections for such Personal Data) by notifying Strigo promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Strigo's notice in connection therewith. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Strigo will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer's configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Strigo is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate without penalty the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Strigo without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Strigo. Strigo will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Client may object to Anacle’s use of a Sub-processor by notifying Anacle in writing. If Client objects to a Sub-processor as permitted in the preceding sentence, Anacle will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the SaaS Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s configuration or use of the SaaS Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening Client. If Anacle is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Client may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those SaaS Services which cannot be provided by Anacle without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor by providing written notice to Anacle. Anacle will refund Client any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated SaaS Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Client.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Client may reasonably object to Dazz’s use of alternative Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Dazz promptly in writing within three
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. If Customer has a reasonable basis to object to Project Agora’s use of a specific Sub-processor, Customer shall notify Project Agora in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Project Agora’s notice of engagement of said Sub-processor in the Services. In the event Customer objects to the engagement of a Sub- processor and that objection is reasonable and based on specific concerns, Project Agora will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the affected Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the affected Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to Sub-processor. If Project Agora is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) in respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Project Agora without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Project Agora.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Customer may object to ODASEVA’s use of a new Sub processor by notifying ODASEVA promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of ODASEVA’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 (“ Information Regarding Current and/or New Sub-processors”). In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, ODASEVA will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If ODASEVA is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by ODASEVA without the use of the objected-to new Sub- processor by providing written notice to ODASEVA. ODASEVA will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.