No impact. The failure by either Party at any time to exercise or enforce any of its powers, remedies or rights under this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of those powers, remedies or rights or affect that Party's rights to exercise or enforce those powers, remedies or rights at any time.
No impact. The Recipient shall not undertake the Project, nor permit any activity to take place in connection with Project which would in any way affect the insurance coverage required hereunder.
No impact. 20. This Agreement shall not be administered or interpreted in any way that would cause adverse impacts to SWP approved Table A water or to any other SWP approved water allocations, water deliveries, or SWP operations or facilities. SGPWA and SBVMWD shall be responsible, jointly and severally, as determined by DWR, for any adverse impacts that may result from water deliveries under this Agreement.
No impact. If an improvement or usage is determined to be serviceable within the framework of the existing System, the Authority shall provide written documentation of the findings of the impact determination authorizing the improvement to proceed to construction plan development or authorizing the usage.
No impact. The proposed project is located more than two miles from a public airport. The project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area.
No impact. This column is checked when the Project would not result in any 32 impact in the category or the category does not apply. 33 The checklist evaluates the potential for impacts within lands under the jurisdiction of 34 the CSLC only, as determined in Section 1.1. The following resources (Table 2-1) would 35 either not be impacted by the Project or are located outside the CSLC’s jurisdiction and, 36 therefore, will not be addressed further in this document. May 2016 2-1 Addendum to Negative Declaration Xxxxxxx Seawall Repair 2.0 Environmental Checklist and Analysis Table 2-1. Resources Outside of CSLC Jurisdiction for this Project Resource Discussion Agriculture and Forest Resources The Project would take place on a sea cliff adjacent to a residence (000 Xxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx), and the shoreline northwest of New Brighton State Beach. Since no farmland, agricultural use, or forest land occurs in the Project area, no impacts would occur to agriculture or forest resources. Geology and Soils According to the Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Associates (1985) report prepared for the original project, the cliff face in the Project area exposes topsoil and terrace gravels approximately overlying the Purisima formation. The terrace deposit is chiefly composed of silty sands and gravels with some clay layers. The underlying Purisima formation is chiefly composed of silty sandstone with layers of cemented shell fragments. Both earth units are susceptible to erosion. In addition, Capitola is located in a very seismically active area. Historical records of the area show that earthquakes of 6.5 to 7.0 magnitude occur periodically on the San Andreas Fault (City 2013). Since the Project involves the repair of an existing seawall that stabilizes a cliff face and reduces the risk of landslides and erosion, it would not have the potential to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects related to seismic events. The base of the existing seawall is not located on expansive soils and the Project would not include waste water disposal systems. Therefore, the Project would not result in substantial adverse impacts to geology and soils. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment or result in the release of hazardous materials with implementation of Project BMPs. The Project would not take place on a hazardous materials site and is not located near an airport or private airstrip. In addition...
No impact. Per the submitted Project description and BMPs, repair work would be 12 conducted during daylight hours at low tide, and lighting of the beach area would be 13 prohibited; therefore, no new source of light or glare would result in impacts to the 14 surrounding area. Addendum to Negative Declaration 2-4 May 2016 Xxxxxxx Seawall Repair
No impact. There are no historical resources within the Project area. In 3 addition, the Project would not disturb any ground surface other than the sea cliff; 4 therefore, no impacts are anticipated to historical, archaeological, or tribal cultural 5 resources. In addition, no human remains would be disturbed.
No impact. The Project does not include placing housing or structures within a 6 100-year flood hazard area, or expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 7 injury, or death due to flooding. May 2016 2-13 Addendum to Negative Declaration Xxxxxxx Seawall Repair 2.0 Environmental Checklist and Analysis
No impact. The Project would not physically divide a community or conflict with 3 any applicable land use plan.
