Network Design Based on Quality Sample Clauses

Network Design Based on Quality. Article 1, Section 1.02 4% of total performance penalty at risk. Expectation: Contractor shall include quality criteria into its Exchange network development, with a phased approach starting in plan year 2017. Contractor will report on progress after 2017 plan year is complete, in 2018, through the Application for Certification for 2019. Performance Levels Contractor is unable to describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development by end of year 2017: 4% penalty Contractor reports strategy for inclusion of quality criteria in all networks offered to Exchange enrollees, and demonstrates implementation of criteria by end of year 2017: No penalty Contractor fulfills the requirement for “no penalty” above, plus submits documentation that contracted hospitals have been notified in 2017 of expectation to meet targets for appropriate use of C- Section and reduction in Hospital Acquired Conditions by 2019: 4% credit
Network Design Based on Quality. Article 1, Section 1.021 4% of total performance penalty at risk.
Network Design Based on Quality. Attachment 7, Article 1, Section 1.02 - 4% of total performance penalty for Group 3 Contractor shall include quality criteria into its Exchange network development, with a phased approach starting in plan year 2017 and continuing in plan years 2018,2019, and 2020. Measurement Year 2017 Expectation: Describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development and begin implementation of criteria Performance Levels: Contractor is unable to describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development by end of year 2017: 4% penalty Contractor reports strategy for inclusion of quality criteria in all networks offered to Exchange enrollees, and demonstrates implementation of criteria by end of year 2017: No penalty Contractor reports strategy for inclusion of quality criteria in all networks offered to Exchange enrollees, demonstrates Measurement Year 2018 Expectation: Describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development and begin implementation of criteria Performance Levels: Contractor is unable to describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development by end of year 2018: 4% penalty Contractor submits report showing that quality criteria for all provider types has been applied to at least part of each Exchange network offered to Exchange enrollees by end of 2018; report shows that providers have been reviewed against established quality metrics and providers not meeting metrics either have a corrective action plan Measurement Year 2019 Expectation: Describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development and begin implementation of criteria Performance Levels: Contractor is unable to describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development by end of year 2019: 4% penalty Contractor submits report showing that quality criteria for all provider types has been applied to at least part of each Exchange network offered to Exchange enrollees by end of 2019; report shows that those providers that have been reviewed against established quality metrics and providers not meeting metrics either have a corrective Measurement Year 2020 Expectation: Describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development and begin implementation of criteria Performance Levels: Contractor submits report and is unable to describe valid inclusion of quality criteria into Exchange network development for all provider types by the end of 2020 ...

Related to Network Design Based on Quality

  • SERVICE LEVEL DESCRIPTION The Fund Accounting Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the Service Level Description attached thereto and replacing it in its entirety with the Service Level Description attached hereto.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.

  • Attachment A, Scope of Services The scope of services is amended as follows:

  • Milestone Schedule Please state the status and progress of each Milestone and identify any completed Milestone(s) for the previous calendar quarter.

  • Network Interconnection Architecture Each Party will plan, design, construct and maintain the facilities within their respective systems as are necessary and proper for the provision of traffic covered by this Agreement. These facilities include but are not limited to, a sufficient number of trunks to the point of interconnection with the tandem company, and sufficient interoffice and interexchange facilities and trunks between its own central offices to adequately handle traffic between all central offices within the service areas at a P.01 grade of service or better. The provisioning and engineering of such services and facilities will comply with generally accepted industry methods and practices, and will observe the rules and regulations of the lawfully established tariffs applicable to the services provided.