Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation Sample Clauses
The Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation clause establishes the requirement for ongoing oversight and review of a project's progress and outcomes. Typically, this clause outlines the methods and frequency by which performance data will be collected, analyzed, and reported, such as through regular progress reports, site visits, or performance metrics. Its core practical function is to ensure accountability and transparency, enabling parties to identify issues early, measure success against agreed objectives, and make informed decisions for future actions or improvements.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. A. Authorized State and County representatives shall have the right to monitor, assess, and evaluate the Contractor’s performance pursuant to this Agreement. Said monitoring, assessment, and evaluation may include, but is not limited to, audits, inspections of project premises, inspection of food preparation sites, and interviews of project staff and participants.
B. The Contractor shall cooperate with the State and County in the monitoring, assessment, and evaluation processes, which include making any Administrative program and fiscal staff available during any scheduled process.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. Authorized state, federal and/or KHS representatives shall have the right to monitor, assess, and evaluate Contractor’s performance pursuant to this Agreement. Said monitoring, assessment, and evaluation may include, but is not limited to, audits, inspections of project premises, interviews of project staff and participants, and review of all records and documents as the Director deems appropriate, at any time pursuant to 42 CFR 438.3 (h). Contractor shall cooperate with KHS in the monitoring, assessment, and evaluation process, which includes making any program or administrative staff available during any scheduled process. The monitoring activities will be either announced or unannounced.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. Authorized state, federal and/or KHS representatives shall have the right to monitor, assess, and evaluate Contractor’s performance pursuant to this Agreement. Said monitoring, assessment, and evaluation may include, but is not limited to, audits, inspections of project premises, interviews of project staff and participants, and review of all records. Contractor shall cooperate with KHS in the monitoring, assessment, and evaluation process, which includes making any program or administrative staff available during any scheduled process.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. The Contractor shall warrant a process for the regular review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the technical and organisational protective measures. This shall be done by: ● a data protection officer being appointed ● regular security tests (e.g. penetration test) and revisions taking place ● all employees being obliged and instructed in writing to comply with data protection regulations ● the employees entrusted with data processing being familiarised with the regulations on data protection in data protection training courses Access to Information Systems and data, as well as significant system events, must be logged by log management solution. Information Systems audit logs must be protected from unauthorized access or modification. A responsible person shall analyze the alerts and investigate suspicious activity or suspected violations. Automated systems shall support near real-time analysis and alerting of adverse events (e.g., malicious code, potential intrusions, etc.) and integrate intrusion detection into access and flow control
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. Service Provider shall develop, implement and maintain policies, procedures and processes for internal monitoring and evaluation of service delivery, as well as external through the input of the service recipients and accounting practices.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. A. Authorized A4AA representatives shall have the right to monitor, assess, and evaluate the FUNDED PARTNER’S administrative, fiscal, and program performance pursuant to this Contract Agreement. Said monitoring, assessment, and evaluation may include, but is not limited to, administrative processes, policies and procurement, audits, inspections of project premises, inspection of food preparation sites, interviews of project staff and participants, and review of administrative documentation including nonprofit board minutes.
B. The FUNDED PARTNER shall cooperate with A4AA in the monitoring, assessment, and evaluation processes, which includes making any administrative, program and fiscal staff available during any scheduled process.
C. The FUNDED PARTNER shall, upon request, make available client participation records and fiscal records which confirm all data contained in monthly performance and monthly financial reports (MFRs). The information shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. FUNDED PARTNER is responsible for maintaining supporting documentation including financial and statistical records, contracts, subcontracts or grant agreements, monitoring reports, and all other pertinent records until a California Department of Aging audit of A4AA has been completed and an audit resolution has been issued.
D. The FUNDED PARTNER shall demonstrate an ongoing mechanism for internal monitoring and evaluation of the program.
E. The FUNDED PARTNER shall maintain formal procedures for obtaining the views of participants regarding service operations. Suggestions relative to program changes/modifications must receive appropriate consideration by FUNDED PARTNER. Acceptable methods for soliciting consumer input include, but are not limited to: suggestion box, project council/advisory group, client questionnaires, and interviews.
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. The Contractor shall warrant a process for the regular review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the technical and organisational protective measures. This shall be done by:
Monitoring, Assessment and Evaluation. The training supervisor is mainly tasked to monitor the progress of the student-trainee. He coordinates with the training entity supervisor regarding the performance of the student-trainee and conducts company visits. During the company visits, the training supervisor asks from the training entity supervisor how well the student responds to the tasks assigned to him and how he deals with the day-to-day WBL activities. Moreover, the student-trainee prepares a Weekly Training Report, noted by the Training Entity Supervisor, who at the same time provides his feedback on the performance of the student-trainee, if any. The said form is used as part of the monitoring of the training supervisor in addition to the company visits. These reports are compiled and submitted to the training supervisor at the end of the WBL course and serve as basis for the preparation and completion of the Internship Accomplishment Report. The performance of the student-trainee is assessed by the Training Entity Supervisor and the Training Supervisor. The Training Entity Supervisor accomplishes the Competency Evaluation Form, and the Performance Evaluation Form. The Competency Evaluation Form is composed of various components, which include Basic Competencies, Academic Skills and Business-related Skills. However, the elements of the mentioned components vary based on the competency required in the programme. The Performance Evaluation Form on the other hand includes items along Work Performance and Personality Traits. The Training Supervisor evaluates the overall performance of the student-trainee by considering the assessment results of the training entity, and the rating of the Accomplishment Evaluation, including the classroom participation during the WBL course. He follows the grading system of the University in computing the final grade of the student, with the following breakdown: • Supervisor’s Assessment - Performance Evaluation 50% - Competency Evaluation 20% • Adviser’s Assessment - Accomplishment Evaluation 30% 100% The Internship Accomplishment Report, which is submitted to the Training Supervisor as one of the elements of the Student Performance Evaluation has the following contents: