MLT TESTING Clause Samples

The MLT TESTING clause establishes the requirements and procedures for conducting MLT (Manufacturing Line Testing) on products or components. Typically, this clause outlines the specific tests to be performed, the standards or protocols to be followed, and the responsibilities of each party in the testing process. For example, it may require that products undergo certain electrical or functional tests before shipment to ensure compliance with agreed specifications. The core function of this clause is to ensure product quality and reliability by mandating systematic testing, thereby reducing the risk of defects and ensuring that only compliant products reach the customer.
MLT TESTING. 11.1 AT&T ARKANSAS agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold AT&T ARKANSAS’ services. AT&T ARKANSAS will make MLT testing functionality available through AT&T ARKANSAS’ Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold AT&T ARKANSAS’ POTS services.
View SourceView Similar (11)
MLT TESTING. 11.1 AT&T OKLAHOMA agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold AT&T OKLAHOMA’s services. AT&T OKLAHOMA will make MLT testing functionality available through AT&T OKLAHOMA’s Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold AT&T OKLAHOMA’s POTS services.
View SourceView Similar (10)
MLT TESTING. Except in exceptional circumstances, as stated below, when a SPRINT customer on a resold line reports a service problem to SPRINT, SPRINT shall perform Mechanized Loop Testing (MLT) on that line prior to reporting the service problem to VERIZON. The parties will work cooperatively to develop a list of exceptional circumstances in which SPRINT need not perform an MLT test, which shall include, but not be limited to circumstances in which the service problem is due to a visually or otherwise readily identifiable service problem (e.g., a downed drop wire) or the applicable VERIZON systems needed to perform an MLT test are not operational. In addition, VERIZON, in its discretion, may perform MLT testing to diagnose a trouble.
View SourceView Similar (5)
MLT TESTING. SBC TEXAS agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold SBC TEXAS services. SBC TEXAS will make MLT testing functionality available through SBC TEXAS' Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold SBC TEXAS POTS services.
View SourceView Similar (2)
MLT TESTING. SBC KANSAS agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold SBC KANSAS’ services. SBC KANSAS will make MLT testing functionality available through SBC KANSAS’ Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold SBC KANSAS’ POTS services.
View SourceView Similar (2)
MLT TESTING. 73 EXHIBIT A to Part II.......................................................74 PART III: SERVICE DESCRIPTION -- ANCILLARY FUNCTIONS.......................76
View Source
MLT TESTING. Except in exceptional circumstances, as stated below, when a COVAD customer served by COVAD using an unbundled Network Element Local Loop or reports a service problem to COVAD, COVAD shall perform Mechanized Loop Testing (MLT) on the Local Loop and line port prior to reporting the service problem to ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC. The Parties will work cooperatively to develop a list of exceptional circumstances in which COVAD need not perform an MLT test, which shall include, but not be limited to circumstances in which the service problem is due to a visually or otherwise readily identifiable service problem (e.g., a downed drop wire) or the applicable ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC systems needed to perform an MLT test are not operational. In addition, ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC, in its discretion, may perform MLT testing to diagnose a trouble. ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC will maintain all unbundled Network Elements provided by ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC to COVAD, including but not limited to the Local Loop (and line ports). EXHIBIT A to Part II Bona Fide Request Process 1. The following process shall be used to promptly consider and analyze requests by COVAD for unbundled Network Elements required to be provided under the Act which are not specifically identified in this Agreement. These requests by COVAD shall hereinafter be referred to as "Bona Fide Requests." 2. A Bona Fide Request shall be submitted in writing and shall include a technical description of each requested unbundled Network Element. 3. Within ten (10) business days of receipt, ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC shall acknowledge receipt of the Bona Fide Request. 4. Except under extraordinary circumstances, within thirty (30) days of its receipt of a Bona Fide Request, ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC shall provide to COVAD a preliminary analysis in writing of such Bona Fide Request (hereinafter referred to as a "Preliminary Analysis") at no charge to COVAD. The Preliminary Analysis shall (i) state whether the unbundled Network Element requested by COVAD is readily or currently available, and if so, confirm that ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC will promptly offer access to the unbundled Network Element or (ii) provide an explanation that access to the unbundled Network Element is not technically feasible or available and/or that the request does not qualify as an unbundled Network Element that is required to be provided by ▇▇▇▇ ATLANTIC under the Act. In the case of clause (ii) above, the Parties shall undertake good faith negotiations to redefine the request, and in the event of impasse either Party may seek relief...
View Source
MLT TESTING. 13.1 SWBT agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold SWBT services. SWBT will make MLT testing functionality available through SWBT's Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold SWBT POTS services. This Exhibit is an integral part of the Master Agreement for Access to Poles, Ducts, Conduits, and Rights-of-Way to which it is attached and contains administrative forms referred to in the Master Agreement or used in connection with the provision of access to SWBT’s poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way. The forms are forms presently in use and have not been fully conformed to the Master Agreement. The forms may be further revised by SWBT to conform to the Master Agreement and revised from time to time to reflect changes in the applicable law, changes in the Master Agreement, and changes in the procedures through which access to poles, ducts, conduits, and rights-of-way is afforded by SWBT to CLEC and others. SW-9433: Pole Attachments SW-9434: Access Application and Make-Ready Authorization SW-9435: Conduit Occupancy SW-9436A: Notification of Surrender or Modification of Pole Attachment License by Licensee SW-9436B: Notification of Surrender or Modification of Conduit Occupancy License by Applicant SW-9436C: Notification of Unauthorized Attachments by Applicant
View Source
MLT TESTING. SBC KANSAS agrees to provide access to MLT testing to allow CLEC to test its end user lines for resold SBC KANSAS’ services. SBC KANSAS will make MLT testing functionality available through SBC KANSAS’ Toolbar Trouble Administration to allow CLEC to test its end-user lines for resold SBC KANSAS’ POTS services. Page 93 of 397 ATTACHMENT 4: CONNECTIVITY BILLING-RESALE/SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P. This Attachment 4: Connectivity Billing-Resale describes the requirements for SBC KANSAS to bill all charges CLEC incurs for purchasing Resale services.
View Source

Related to MLT TESTING

  • ODUF Testing 6.6.1 Upon request from TWTC, AT&T shall send ODUF test files to TWTC. The Parties agree to review and discuss the ODUF file content and/or format. For testing of usage results, AT&T shall request that TWTC set up a production (live) file. The live test may consist of TWTC’s employees making test calls for the types of services TWTC requests on ODUF. These test calls are logged by TWTC, and the logs are provided to AT&T. These logs will be used to verify the files. Testing will be completed within thirty (30) days from the date on which the initial test file was sent.

  • Meter Testing Company shall provide at least twenty-four (24) hours' notice to Seller prior to any test it may perform on the revenue meters or metering equipment. Seller shall have the right to have a representative present during each such test. Seller may request, and Company shall perform, if requested, tests in addition to the every fifth-year test and Seller shall pay the cost of such tests. Company may, in its sole discretion, perform tests in addition to the fifth year test and Company shall pay the cost of such tests. If any of the revenue meters or metering equipment is found to be inaccurate at any time, as determined by testing in accordance with this Section 10.2 (Meter Testing), Company shall promptly cause such equipment to be made accurate, and the period of inaccuracy, as well as an estimate for correct meter readings, shall be determined in accordance with Section 10.3 (Corrections).

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Product Testing Product shall be tested through reliable and valid means with documentation, consistent with the industry’s best practices.

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act. (B) All classes covered by this Agreement are designated special risk classes for drug testing purposes. Special risk means employees who are required as a condition of employment to be certified under Chapter 633 or Chapter 943, F.S. (C) An employee shall have the right to grieve any disciplinary action taken under section 112.0455, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, subject to the limitations on the grievability of disciplinary actions in Article 10. If an employee is not disciplined but is denied a demotion, reassignment, or promotion as a result of a positive confirmed drug test, the employee shall have the right to grieve such action in accordance with Article 6.