Methods of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Methods of Evaluation. The Society recognizes that where employment decisions may be affected by the outcome of an evaluation process, a fair and formal process as set out in Article 14.5 must be followed. It further recognizes that the process to assist and encourage professional growth by teachers as referred to in Article 15.1 does not form part of such formal process.

Methods of Evaluation. Exams/Tests B. Projects C. Homework

Methods of Evaluation. Student evaluation will incorporate a variety of methods that may include, but are not limited to: portfolio items, review of assignments by teachers, observation, teacher-made evaluations, assessments, proctored exams, main lesson book evaluation, any other student work to be graded, and written and oral tests and quizzes. Submission of original portfolio and original student work samples by the stated deadlines is required to participate in the program. If the work assigned does not produce a tangible work product (e.g. reading, recitation, physical activity, etc.) the finished log(s), photographs and/or video recordings will serve as the work product for that assignment.

Methods of Evaluation. A formal evaluation will be conducted at six monthly intervals for the progress report. It is the Registrar’s responsibility to ensure progress reports are submitted to the Psychologists Board of Australia by the due date. Further formal evaluation sessions may also be included to track progress. Please see Appendix for further details of Supervisor and Registrar responsibilities. . SIGNATURES I agree to adhere strictly to this agreement and to seek clarification from my supervisor where necessary. _____________________________ ___________________________ Supervisor Date ______________________________ ____________________________ Registrar Date

Methods of Evaluation. A. Exams/Tests B. Oral Presentation C. Demonstration

Methods of Evaluation. A variety of evaluation tools may be used to determine if the student has met the academic objectives for each attendance period (i.e. written or oral reports, written or oral tests, interviews, projects, demonstrations of skills, technology-based presentations, completed written assignments, and portfolios). The assignment specific method of evaluation will be determined by parent and program specialist. East Whittier City School District Homeschool Program Homeschool Program Agreement (page 2)

Methods of Evaluation. The evaluation process shall use two methods: Questionnaires filled in by an instructors’ students, or an equivalent instrument for counsellors, librarians, and, with the approval of the Joint Steering Committee, other instructors; and, Observations of performance by department heads, coordinator or assistant department heads. The methods listed in Article 3 above shall be applied through procedures and instruments which have been approved by the Joint Steering Committee as per Article The shall be responsible for approving the procedures and instruments of evaluation. The Joint Steering Committee shall follow fair and consistent principles for the evaluation of term and probationary instructors. The Joint Steering Committee shall be involved in the clarification of procedures, but not in the monitoring of departmental and area processes. Instructors may make submissions to the regarding the evaluation instruments and their application in their department or area. As per Article of the attached Collective Agreement, the may make revisions to the Guidelines for Evaluation of Term and Probationary Regular instructors. The shall notify the College and the of any revisions it makes.

Methods of Evaluation. Student evaluation will incorporate a variety of methods that may include but are not limited to: review of assignments by teachers, observation, teacher-made evaluations, assessments, proctored exams, main lesson book evaluation, other student work to be graded, and written and oral tests/quizzes. Submission of student work samples by the stated school deadlines is required to participate in the program. If the work assigned does not produce a tangible work product (e.g. reading, recitation, physical activity, etc.) the finished log(s) and/or video recordings will serve as the work product for that assignment.

Methods of Evaluation a. The evaluation process shall include observations, formal and informal, of the teacher's classroom performance, appraisal of the performance of other assigned school activities, and assessment of the teacher's achievement of professional objectives established at the beginning of the evaluation process. b. The following shall apply to formal classroom observations: (1) The observation may be preceded by a pre-observation conference between the teacher and the observer who may be the designated evaluator or another appropriate administrator, if the observer believes it is appropriate or the teacher so requests. (2) The observer shall make a written report of the formal observation. A copy of the report shall be given to the teacher, normally within ten (10) school days of the observation. A copy shall be maintained by the designated evaluator for inclusion in the summary evaluation at the end of the school year. The observation report shall designate areas needing improvement, if any, and recommendations which will assist the teacher in achieving improvement in those areas. (3) If the observer determines that it is appropriate or if the teacher so requests, a formal observation shall include a pre- and post- observation conference at which the observation will be discussed. At the post-observation conference the teacher shall receive a copy of the preliminary written report, which shall not become final until the teacher has an opportunity to provide supplementary data to be considered by the evaluator. c. Informal observations and classroom visitations may be made and will result in a written report, with a copy delivered to the teacher normally within five working days of the visit. d. Conferences other than those associated with observations may be scheduled to discuss progress toward professional objectives, needed modifications or additions, and overall performance of the teacher. Such conferences may be initiated either by the designated evaluator or by the teacher.