Methods 2 Sample Clauses
The "Methods 2" clause defines the specific procedures or techniques that must be followed in the performance of certain tasks or obligations under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the standards, protocols, or methodologies that parties are required to use, such as adhering to industry best practices or using particular equipment or processes. By clearly specifying the required methods, this clause ensures consistency, quality, and compliance, thereby reducing the risk of disputes over how work should be performed.
Methods 2. Financial offer and preference
(a) Score each tender in respect of the financial offer made and preferences claimed, if any, in accordance with the provisions of F.3.11.7 and F.3.11.8.
(b) Calculate the total number of tender evaluation points (TEV) in accordance with the following formula: TEV = NFO + NP where: NFO is the number of tender evaluation points awarded for the financial offer made in accordance with F.3.11.7; NP is the number of tender evaluation points awarded for preferences claimed in accordance with F.3.11.8.
(c) Rank tender offers from the highest number of tender evaluation points to the lowest.
(d) Recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points for the award of the contract, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so.
(e) Rescore and re-rank all tenderers should there be compelling and justifiable reasons not to recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, and recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so and the process set out in this sub clause is repeated.
Methods 2. Financial offer and preference
a) Score each tender in respect of the financial offer made and preferences claimed, if any, in accordance with the provisions of F.3.11.7 and F.3.11.8.
b) Calculate the total number of tender evaluation points (TEV) in accordance with the following formula: where: NFO is the number of tender evaluation points awarded for the financial offer made in accordance with F.3.11.7;
c) Rank tender offers from the highest number of tender evaluation points to the lowest.
d) Recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points for the award of the contract, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so.
e) Rescore and re-rank all tenderers should there be compelling and justifiable reasons not to recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, and recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so and the process set out in this sub clause is repeated
Methods 2. Financial offer and preference