Man Sample Clauses

Man. The Common Area and Parcels are subject to all easements and rights of way shown on the Map.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Man. INVESTMENTS AG, a company incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability whose registered address is Xxxxxxxxxxxx 00, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx XX, Xxxxxxxxxxx (the “Introducing Broker”); and
Man. In-Plant. Omthera shall have the right, at Omthera’s expense, to put a man-in-plant at BioVectra’s facility to support BioVectra in achieving its manufacturing goals and to resolve any issues relating to the manufacture and supply of the Product that may occur during the Term. Any such representative of Omthera will be subject to basic training on BioVectra’s quality system including safety policies and procedures and will be required to sign a waiver of liability.
Man. The Head Clothing Man shall receive a rate not less than the highest Third Hand. APPENDIX WAGE INC. SCALE EFFECTIVE MAY Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Class May Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender May 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand Hand APPENDIX PAPER INC. WAGE SCALE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER Class Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Class November Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender November 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand PAPER INC. WAGE SCALE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand November Machine Back 3rd 4th 5th 6th Class Tender Tender Hand Hand Hand Hand Machine Back Class Tender Tender November 3rd 4th 5th 6th Hand Hand Hand WAGE RATES PAPER MACHINE ROOM When the highest paid Machine Tender's rate has been determined, thirty - five cents per hour, per machine supervised shall be added t o determine the Boss Machine Tender's rate. May Nov. Nov. Boss Machine Tender (4 machines) Boss Machine Tender (3 machines) Boss Machine Tender (1 machine) No. Machine 158 " NO. 1400' 1449' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand No. Machine 158 " Class No. 1300 ' 1349' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand No. Machine Clas s No. 1350 ' 1399 ' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand Sixth Hand May Nov. Nov. No. Machine 189 " Class No. 1450 ' 1499' Machine Tender Back Tender Third Hand Fourth Hand Fifth Hand MACHINE ROOM MISCELLANEOUS Rewinder Operator Third Hand 26) Rewinder Operator Fifth Hand 26) Head Clothing Man Paper M i l l Millwright Roll Inspector BEATER ROOM Beater Engineer
Man. DIRECTOR ------------------------ Witness address: XXXXXXXXXXX XXX. 0x 00000 XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX ------------------------ EXHIBIT A GENERAL RELEASE I, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, in consideration of and subject to the performance by GSE Lining Technology, Ltd., a corporation formed under the laws of the United Kingdom (together with its subsidiaries, the "COMPANY"), of its obligations under the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004 (the "AGREEMENT"), do hereby release and forever discharge as of the date hereof the Company and its affiliates and all present and former directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, successors and assigns of the Company and its affiliates and the Company's direct or indirect owners (collectively, the "RELEASED PARTIES") to the extent provided below.
Man. R. 570; Xxxxxx x. Xxxxxxx, [1931] 1 W.W.R. 577. Plaintiffs will have their costs. WILSON J. QL UPDATE: 20021114
Man. Glenwood’s right to occupy and use the Man-Glenwood Portion (and the obligations of Man-Glenwood to pay consideration, as required pursuant to Section 2 hereof) shall terminate on the earliest to occur of: (i) Xxxxx 0, 0000, (xx) the date this Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms or (iii) the date the Amended Lease is terminated pursuant to its terms (the “Termination Date”). If Man-Glenwood’s right to occupy and use the Man-Glenwood Portion expires pursuant to clause (i) of this Section, Man-Glenwood shall have the right to request that this Agreement be extended for an additional five (5) year period (the “Man-Glenwood Option”) to March 1, 2017, and Man Financial agrees to accept such request, which request must be made in writing to Man Financial at least one month prior to the expiration in March 1, 2012. Additionally, if Man Financial chooses to exercise one or both of its two options to renew the Amended Lease for additional five-year periods (each, a “Renewal Option”), as provided in Paragraph 1 of the Lease (each, a “Renewal Period”), as amended by Paragraph 4 of the Amendment, and at each such time Man-Glenwood is still using and occupying the Man-Glenwood Portion, Man Financial shall give notice of such election to Man-Glenwood. Man Financial and Man-Glenwood agree that Man-Glenwood shall thereafter have 10 days to notify Man Financial in writing of whether it would like to continue to occupy and use the Man-Glenwood Portion during all or any portion of the applicable Renewal Period and, if so, both parties hereto agree to extend the Termination Date of this Agreement to reflect such elections; provided, however, that if Man-Glenwood does not exercise the Man-Glenwood Option, it shall not have the right to receive notice of, or exercise any election of use and occupancy during, either Renewal Period, if they should occur, and the Termination Date will not be extended, and, provided further, that, if Man-Glenwood does not exercise its election to continue to occupy and use the Man-Glenwood Portion during the first Renewal Period, it shall not have the right to receive notice of, or exercise any election of use and occupancy during, the next Renewal Period, if one occurs, and the Termination Date will not be extended. Man Financial further agrees that in the event that Man Financial elects not to exercise a Renewal Option and instead leases other premises (the “Other Premises”), and at such time Man-Glenwood is still using and occupying th...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Man. R. (2d) 83, a decision of Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench. This latter case involved a Plaintiff who had very much the same pre-existing problems as did Xx. Xxx. Issues 57 The overall issue is one of causation and the basic principles affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Xxxxx, (supra) apply. The sub-issues are: firstly, did the negligence of the Defendant cause or contribute to the Plaintiff's injuries? Secondly, what would the Plaintiff's "position" before the tort have been, or as Xx. Xxxxxxx Major put it, what would the "Original Position" have been? In other words, before the accident, to what extent was the Plaintiff impaired, both in his ability to work and earn a livelihood, and in his ability to perform and partake in normal, everyday functioning within his home and social setting? Thirdly, what is the Plaintiff's position after the accident or his "Injured Position"? Fourthly, assuming that there is a difference between the Plaintiff's "Original" and "Injured" position and since, in this case, the Plaintiff suffered from a serious pre-existing problem, was there a measurable risk that his paraplegia would have detrimentally affected his future regardless of the Defendant's negligence? Fifthly, once again, assuming that there is a difference between the Plaintiff's "Original" and "Injured" positions, was it caused by or materially contributed to by the negligence of the Defendant? As pointed out by Xx. Xxxxxxx Major at pp. 476-477, was the tort a necessary ingredient in bringing about the Plaintiff's "Injured Position"? Sixth, assuming the answers to numbers 4 and 5 are in the affirmative, then to what extent should the overall damage award be reduced, is the risk measurable or simply speculative? Seventh, was the Plaintiff's injury such that he would, on a balance of probabilities, have returned to his "Original Position" but for the happening of an event or events which occurred prior to trial but which were not caused by or more than minimally contributed to by the Defendant? I agree with Xx. Xxxxxxx Binder of this Court in the Harbora, (supra) case that in appropriate circumstances if number 7 is answered in the affirmative then thereafter the Defendant bears no responsibility. I would add that in other circumstances such a finding may only go to the question of contribution from that point in time forward. Decision: Respecting the Foregoing Issues 58 Firstly, I have found that on a balance of probabilities the ...
Man. We believe that all men and all women are made in the image of God. We affirm that God made humankind as Male and Female. We also affirm that apart from Xxxxxx, all people are in a fallen, sinful and lost condition through the rebellion of Xxxx and Xxx (who were created without sin) and in this inherited state of depravity are helpless to save themselves and are under the condemnation of God to eternal punishment in Hell.
Man. We believe that Man was created, male and female, by a direct act of God, fell into sin and thereby became depraved and guilty before God; that the first man and woman were married by God and that biblical marriage is between a man and a woman only. Sexual intimacy is to occur only within the context of marriage so defined. (Gen. 3; 1:27; 2:19-25; Ps. 51:5; Isa. 64:6; Rom. 1:21-23; 3:23; 5:12, 21; Eph. 5:31)
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.