Loan Review Program Clause Samples

Loan Review Program. Within 60 days of this Agreement, the Bank shall submit to the Reserve Bank and the OFR an acceptable written program for the ongoing review and grading of the Bank's loan portfolio by a qualified independent party. The program shall, at a minimum, address, consider, and include:
View SourceView Similar (7)
Loan Review Program. Within 60 days of this Agreement, the Bank shall submit to the Reserve Bank and the Commissioner an acceptable written program for the ongoing review and grading of the Bank’s loan portfolio by a qualified independent party. The program shall, at a minimum, address, consider, and include:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Loan Review Program. (1) Within sixty (60) days, the Board shall establish, implement, and thereafter ensure Bank adherence to an effective, independent, and on-going loan review system to review, at least quarterly, the Bank’s loan and lease portfolios to assure the timely identification and categorization of problem credits. This system shall provide for a written report to be filed with the Board after each review. Such reports should include, at a minimum, conclusions regarding: (a) the identification, type, rating, and amount of problem loans and leases; (b) the identification and amount of delinquent and nonaccrual loans and leases; (c) credit and collateral documentation exceptions; (d) the identification and status of credit-related violations of law, rule, or regulation; (e) concentrations of credit; (f) loans and leases to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders (and their related interests) of the Bank; and (g) loans and leases not in conformance with the Bank’s lending and leasing policies, and exceptions to the Bank’s lending and leasing policies. (2) Upon adoption, a written description of the system called for in this Article shall be forwarded to the Assistant Deputy Comptroller for review and determination of no supervisory objection. (3) The Board shall evaluate the loan and lease review reports, and shall ensure that immediate, adequate, and continuing remedial action, if appropriate, is taken upon all findings noted in the report. (4) A copy of the reports submitted to the Board, as well as documentation of the action taken by the Bank to collect or strengthen assets identified as problem credits, shall be preserved at the Bank.
View Source

Related to Loan Review Program

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Position Review 18.3.1 Either an employee or the University may request an audit of the duties and responsibilities of a position he/she/it believes is not allocated to the proper class. Employees requesting such an audit are expected to notify the Union at the time of their request. 18.3.2 Job audits will be performed and reclassification decisions will be made by the University’s Human Resources Services staff according to the University’s Classification Process. The affected employee(s) and the Union will be notified of the outcome of a job audit in writing. In the event of a reallocation that results in removal of a position from the bargaining unit, the written notice will describe the manner in which the bargaining unit work is being distributed, including the classification and position(s) of any employee(s) absorbing work from the reallocated position. 18.3.3 If an employee disagrees with a classification decision made by the Human Resources staff, the employee may request review of that decision through the Director of OFM/State Human Resources within 30 (thirty) calendar days of receiving the final allocation decision from the University. Should the employee disagree with the Director’s decision, the employee may further appeal the matter to the Washington Personnel Resources Board within 30 (thirty) calendar days of being provided the written decision of the Director. The Board will render a decision, which will be final and binding. Decisions regarding appropriate classification will be reviewed in accordance with this Section and will not be subject to the grievance procedure specified in Article 40 of this Agreement.