Common use of Licensability Clause in Contracts

Licensability. None of Parent or Merger Sub, or to Parent’s Knowledge, any of their respective Management Principals or Affiliates which may reasonably be considered in the process of determining the suitability of Parent and Merger Sub for any Gaming License by any Gaming Authorities, or any holders of Parent’s capital stock or other equity interests who will be required to be licensed or found suitable under applicable Gaming Laws (the foregoing persons collectively, the “Licensing Affiliates”), has abandoned or withdrawn (in each case in response to a communication from a Gaming Authority regarding a likely or impending denial, suspension or revocation) or been denied or had suspended or revoked a Gaming License, or an application for a Gaming License, by a Gaming Authority, within the five years prior to the date hereof. Parent, Merger Sub, and each of their respective Licensing Affiliates which is licensed or holds any Gaming License pursuant to applicable Gaming Laws (collectively, the “Licensed Parties”) is in good standing in each of the jurisdictions in which such Licensed Party owns, operates, or manages gaming facilities. To Parent’s Knowledge, there are no facts which, if known to any Gaming Authority, would be reasonably likely to (i) result in the denial, revocation, limitation or suspension of a Gaming License of any of the Licensed Parties or (ii) result in a negative outcome to any finding of suitability proceedings of any of the Licensed Parties currently pending, or under the suitability proceedings necessary for the consummation of the Merger.

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Agreement and Plan of Merger (Penn National Gaming Inc), Merger Agreement (Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Inc.)