Journal Articles Clause Samples

The 'Journal Articles' clause defines the terms and conditions governing the creation, submission, and publication of articles in academic or professional journals. Typically, this clause outlines the responsibilities of authors regarding originality, proper citation, and compliance with editorial standards, as well as the rights of the publisher to edit, distribute, or archive the articles. Its core function is to ensure clarity and mutual understanding between authors and publishers, thereby protecting intellectual property rights and maintaining the integrity of the publication process.

Journal Articles. Ambos, Kai. “The Overall Function of International Criminal Law: Striking the Right Balance Between the Rechtsgut and the Harm Principles”, 9 Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2015). ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇. “The ICTY Prosecutor and the Review of the NATO Bombing Campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia”, 12 European Journal of International Law 3 (2001): 503- 530. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “International law protecting the environment during armed conflict: gaps and opportunities”, 92 International Review of the Red Cross 879 (2010): 569-592. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. “Charging Practices in Hazardous Waste Crime Prosecutions”, 62 Ohio State Law Journal 3 (2001): 1077-1144. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. “The Proportionality Principle in the Humanitarian Law of Warfare: Recent Efforts at Codification,” 10 Cornell International Law Journal 1 (1976). ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇. “A Survey of International Customary Rules of Environmental Protection”, 13 Natural Resources Journal (1973): 179-189. ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. “Balancing Profit and Environmental Sustainability in Ecuador: Lessons Learned from the Chevron Case” 24 Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum (2014): 353-373. ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇-Sun, “Emergence of an International Environmental Criminal Law?”, 19 UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 1 (2001): 11-47. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇. “Modes of Warfare and Evolving Standards of Environmental Protection Under the International Law of War” 15 Florida Journal of International Law (2002-2003): 481-539. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. “Wildlife crime scene investigation: techniques, tools and technology”, 9 Endangered Species Research (2009): 229-238. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. “Beyond Symbolism: Problems and Prospects with Prosecuting Environmental Destruction before the ICC”, 15 Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, (2017): 491–507. ▇▇▇-▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Armed Opposition Groups and the Right to Exercise Control over Public Natural Resources: A Legal Analysis of the Cases of Libya and Syria”, 62 Netherlands International Law Review 1 (2015). D'Aspremont ▇▇▇▇ and, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Strategies of Engagement with Scientific Fact- Finding in International Adjudication” 5 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2 (2014):240- 272. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇. “Protection of the Environment in International Armed Conflict” 5 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Yearbook of United Nations Law (2001): 523-549. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Le droit international humanitaire et l’avis consultatif de ...

View Similar (3)

Journal Articles. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2017. “

Journal Articles. A. Print (1) Intl Rev Econ 213 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ‘Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias’ (1991) 5(1) J Econ Perspectives 193 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘Heart of Darkness: Modeling Public–Private Funding Interactions Inside The R&D Black Box’ (2000) 29 Research Policy 1165 ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇, Toole ‘Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence’ (2000) Research Policy 29 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ‘Barriers to Entry’ (1982) 72(1) Am Econ Rev 47 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ‘Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint’ (1969) 12(1) ▇ ▇ & Econ Demsetz H, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’ (1967) 57(2) Am Econ Rev 347 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ V and Versaevel B, ‘Patent Pools and Dynamic R&D Incentives’ (2013) 36 International Review of Law and Economics 59 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B, ‘Just What are Essential Facilities?’ (2001) 38 CM L Rev 397 Dolmans M, ‘A Tale of Two Tragedies – A Plea for Open Standards’ (2010) 2(2) IFOSS L Rev 115 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘The Limits of Antitrust’ (1984) ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ and Rai AK, ‘▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine’ (2003) 662(1) Law and Contemporary Problems 289 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government- Sponsored Research’ (1996) 82(8) Virginia L Rev 1663 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ E, ‘Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory’ (2009) 123(2) Harv L Rev 399 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘Why There Is Too Little, Not Too Much, Private Property’ (2011) 53 Arizona L Rev 51 ▇▇▇▇▇ T and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ R, ‘The Giants Among Us’ (2012) 1 ▇▇▇▇ Tech L Rev 1 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ F, ‘How Predictable is Technological Progress?’ (2016) 45 Research Policy 647 First H, ‘Controlling the Intellectual Property Grab : Protect Innovation, Not Innovators. Public Interest’ (2003) 38 Rutgers LJ 365 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘Revitalizing Essential Facilities’ (2008) 75(1) Antitrust LJ 1 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ MA, ‘Spillovers’, (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review 257 <▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇> ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management’ (2005) 89 Minn L Rev 917 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ‘Evaluating the Demsetzian Trend in Copyright Law’, (2007) 3(3) Rev L & Econ 2 Gal MS, ‘Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly’ (2004) 49(2) Antitrust Bulletin 343 Geradin D, ‘Pricing Abuses by Essential Patent Holders in a Standard-setting Context: A View f...

Journal Articles indicates co-author is/was a student when the research was conducted