Iterative Design Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Iterative Design. As we highlighted earlier in this deliverable, Value Mapping is an iterative process, and the design needs to be continuously refined based on feedback and evaluations of stakeholders. After we retrieved all the feedback from the case study discussed above, we conducted a workshop with 42 international stakeholders ranging from policymakers, legal scholars, ethicists, farmer representative groups, AgriTech providers, farming machinery manufacturers, and so forth. For this workshop, we broke the participants into three groups, where the authors of this deliverable coordinated and led the discussion. We had posters on the walls of the room with the six stakeholders with all the relevant values mentioned earlier in the deliverable in each section. The participants were assigned to provide green or red stickers to each of the values for the stakeholders, depending on if they were positively or negatively impacted by data-sharing through data spaces for that stakeholder (see Appendix 2). We also took notes of their reasoning for such decisions and discussed when and where there may be a potential clash or conflict of values among stakeholders in the process. We noticed many similarities and overlaps with the results from the Spanish case study, but also, additional insights and feedback (see Table 9). Table 9: Workshop groups aggregated. results Farmers Human Welfare 3 3 Justice 1 1 Privacy 2 5 Accountability 3 Informed Consent 1 2 Solidarity 1 Control 8 1 Dignity 3 Trust 7 Sustainability 3 1 Autonomy 2 3 Others: Farming Advisors Human Welfare 1 Justice Privacy 1 Accountability 7 1 Informed Consent 1 Solidarity Control 1 6 Dignity Trust 7 1 Sustainability 4 1 Autonomy 1 2 Others: Farmers Associations Human Welfare 1 4 Justice 2 Privacy 3 Accountability 1 2 Informed Consent 1 Solidarity 8 Control 2 5 Dignity Trust 4 1 Sustainability 2 Autonomy 2 2 Others: Technology providers and intermediaries Human Welfare 1 4 Justice 1 1 Privacy 1 5 Accountability 4 1 Informed Consent 3 1 Solidarity 4 Control 4 6 Dignity 3 Trust 5 Sustainability 5 1 Autonomy 1 6 Others: Public and regulatory bodies Human Welfare 4 Justice 5 Privacy 1 1 Accountability 6 Informed Consent Solidarity 1 Control 4 2 Dignity Trust 9 Sustainability 6 Autonomy 2 1 Others: Society Human Welfare 1 Justice 5 Privacy 1 6 Accountability 2 1 Informed Consent 3 Solidarity 1 1 Control 4 Dignity 1 Trust 4 Sustainability 9 Autonomy 3 Others: Overall, there was a positive reaction among the participants about th...
Iterative Design. EUDAT uses an incremental and iterative approach for service development (generically known as Rapid Application Development). The iterative approach in general consists of requirements gathering, design, implementation and re-assessment of a service, as depicted in Figure 2. The user communities are actively involved during all these processes from the definition of requirements to the evaluation. This builds a sense of mutual trust, as well as developing a shared (technical) vocabulary and understanding of the relevant constraints and opportunities. This leads to the technology and service providers having a better understanding of the users’ (or stakeholders’) requirements. It ensures that EUDAT will provide services that fulfil the needs of the research communities and that will actually be used by the users from the different communities.