Issue 3 Sample Clauses
Issue 3. 5.3 Parties’ Positions
Issue 3. Whether combinations of scenarios evaluated by Staff produce a reasonable set of REP benefits pursuant to section 7(b)(2) and whether the set of streams are biased toward showing the Settlement is reasonable. 67
Issue 3. Whether all scenarios must show adequate 7(b)(2) rate protection ex ante in order for BPA to adopt the Settlement, or whether scenario results can be evaluated holistically 73
Issue 3. Is First Coast’s application inconsistent with Duval County’s, Nassau County’s, or Baker County’s comprehensive plans?
Issue 3. Whether BPA should allow an exchanging utility to remarket In-Lieu PF Power in the event it chooses to take physical delivery of such power from BPA as part of an in-lieu transaction.
Issue 3. Whether the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ construct should be deleted in its entirety.
Issue 3. Recommendations Regarding Registration and the Need for Legal Development to Facilitate Consensual ADR As was discussed in Chapter 3, Article VIII of the Outer Space Treaty has been elaborated in the Registration Convention, which sets out specific rules of how registration over space objects is to be made. However, the information required to be furnished to the UN Secretary-General under Article IV(1) of the Registration Convention is deemed as vague and gen- eral, which does not effectively enable States to identify objects in space after their launch into orbit.
Issue 3. Whether BPA should change the start of the commencement date in the RPSA from October 1 to November 1.
