IRO Sample Clauses

IRO. 010-2 R3.1. A mutually agreeable format X X Each The CAISO and TE shall each maintain compliance with this requirement with respect to its operations as identified in the operating procedure 3130 established by the CAISO. IRO-010-2 R3.2. A mutually agreeable process for resolving data conflicts X X Each The CAISO and TE shall each maintain compliance with this requirement with respect to its operations as identified in the operating procedure 3130 established by the CAISO. IRO-010-2 R3.3. A mutually agreeable security protocol X X Each The CAISO and TE shall each maintain compliance with this requirement with respect to its operations as identified in the operating procedure 3130 established by the CAISO. IRO-017-1 R2. Each Transmission Operator and Balancing Authority shall perform the functions specified in its Reliability Coordinator’s outage coordination process. X Single MOD-001-1a R1. Each Transmission Operator shall select one of the methodologies1 listed below for calculating Available Transfer Capability (ATC) or Available Flowgate Capability (AFC) for each ATC Path per time period identified in R2 for those Facilities within its Transmission operating area: - The Area Interchange Methodology, as described in MOD-028 - The Rated System Path Methodology, as described in MOD-029 - The Flowgate Methodology, as described in MOD-030 X Single Responsibility Standard Req. Text of Requirement CAISO TE Responsibility (either Each, Split, Single or N/A) Responsibility Details MOD-001-1a R6. When calculating Total Transfer Capability (TTC) or Total Flowgate Capability (TFC) the Transmission Operator shall use assumptions no more limiting than those used in the planning of operations for the corresponding time period studied, providing such planning of operations has been performed for that time period. X Single MOD-008-1 R1. Each Transmission Operator shall prepare and keep current a TRM Implementation Document (TRMID) that includes, as a minimum, the following information: X Single
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IRO. Responsibilities The IRO shall:‌‌

Related to IRO

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Pending Further Analysis  Current Ratio is between 1.0 and 1.1 and one-year trend is negative or  Current Ratio is less than or equal to 1.0

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Minimum Staffing The Employer agrees to employ sufficient registered staff and health care aides/ Personal Support Workers to meet the staffing needs that may be set from time to time by statute and/or regulation. In the event that there is insufficient staffing to meet this undertaking, the Employer will post vacancies so that any unmet care undertaking will be satisfied.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Work Experience Formula hour equivalents will be given on the basis of the following number of students enrolled at fourth week census: 5-14 students enrolled = 1 (one) formula hour 15-24 students enrolled = 2 (two) formula hours 25-34 students enrolled = 3 (three) formula hours

  • Findings 2. Based on the information known by or provided to the Department, the following findings are asserted for purposes of this Contract:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.