IPI Sample Clauses
The IPI (Intellectual Property Indemnity) clause serves to protect one party from legal liability arising from claims that the use of provided intellectual property infringes on the rights of third parties. In practice, this clause typically requires the party supplying intellectual property—such as software, designs, or trademarks—to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the receiving party if a third party alleges infringement. This protection often covers legal costs, damages, and settlements related to such claims. The core function of the IPI clause is to allocate the risk of intellectual property disputes, ensuring that the party best positioned to manage or avoid infringement bears the associated legal and financial responsibility.
IPI. The action-set independence is a substantive assumption on the structure of a game. For in- stance, it fails in the game of chess.6 Nevertheless, the purpose of this paper is to study self-enforcing agreements. To this end, the assumption is unrestrictive: For games where it fails, one can first require that in an agreement, continuation outcomes that follow finite histories with admissible iPI `8 continuations specify admissible total histories. One can then extend H`8 to Ś Hi by assigning to inadmissible paths payoffs that are sufficiently negative to deter deviations to those paths.
IPI. Mŕ ORD ?00 rax +420 }56 Mt> ??u. vvw i|„. ui, Disclosure Code and HCO undertakes to adhere to such rules during the cooperation established hereunder.
IPI. In consideration for the promises and payments contained herein, IPI, on behalf of itself and all of its affiliates, partners, employees, agents, successors, assigns, predecessors, attorneys, and any other person or persons whose claim may arise by and/or through it, hereby RELEASES any and all claims, actions, causes of action, and demands, of any nature or kind whatsoever, however arising, known or unknown, which IPI now has or hereafter may have or claim to have against Cord, its officers, directors, shareholders, agents, successors, assigns, predecessors, and attorneys, that directly or indirectly, involve, arise out of, or are in any way related to (i) moneys allegedly owed IPI before or as of the day this Settlement Agreement is executed or (ii) Cord's alleged unauthorized use of IPI's intellectual property prior to September 30, 2003; PROVIDED HOWEVER, that nothing in this provision shall preclude any claim that hereafter may arise by virtue of a breach of an undertaking or promise set forth in this Settlement Agreement.