Instructor Evaluation Sample Clauses

Instructor Evaluation. The State College of Florida Department Chair or designee will evaluate Dual Enrollment faculty similar to other adjunct faculty. One of the Dual Enrollment classes will be observed at least once (ideally) during the first year of offering, and periodically as needed in subsequent years. In addition, students will have an opportunity to complete the online student evaluation instrument during the last few weeks of class. More detailed instructions related to this will be given at the time of evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Instructor Evaluation. The PARTIES recognize that instructor evaluation is a collaborative process designed to ensure the best possible training for the apprentices in the program. The expertise of each party, as laid out in 3.4.2 above, shall be employed in evaluating the instructors. Since the instructors are the employees of PROGRAM SPONSOR, final decision on questions of termination or discipline are the sole responsibility of the PROGRAM SPONSOR.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Instructor Evaluation. The State College of Florida Department Chair or designee will evaluate Dual Enrollment faculty similar to other adjunct faculty. One of the Dual Enrollment classes will be observed at least once (ideally) during the first year of offering, and periodically as needed in subsequent years. In addition, students will have an opportunity to complete the online student evaluation instrument during the last few weeks of class. More detailed instructions related to this will be given at the time of evaluation. Grading Policy In accordance with statute 1007.235, it is the responsibility of the postsecondary educational institution for assigning letter grades for dual enrollment courses and the responsibility of school districts for posting dual enrollment course grades to the high school transcript as assigned by the postsecondary institution awarding the credit. Xxxxxx earned while a student is in the Early College program will become part of the student’s permanent college and high school transcript, GPA, and class rank. Students must maintain a 3.0 unweighted GPA in DE or a 2.0 unweighted GPA in CTE-DE in order to remain eligible for the Dual Enrollment/CTE-Dual Enrollment/Early Admissions Programs. SCF does not send grade reports to students or high schools. Students are responsible for submitting their grades to their high schools. Some academic departments (e.g. Mathematics) utilize a common syllabus for each course. In those cases, the faculty member must use the provided syllabus and adhere to the grading procedures and policies outlined on the syllabus including the grading policy that a grade of 60% or higher must be earned on the final exam in order to pass the course with a C or higher. Final Grades  Final grades will be submitted electronically to SCF in accordance with the SCF Academic Calendar. The on-line Faculty handbook provides additional information on electronic grade entry.  Students taking dual enrollment courses on the SCF campus must request a transcript from the SCF Admissions & Records Office and pay the appropriate fee. The student is responsible for insuring that the high school registrar has a certified copy of the transcript or SCF grade report. Otherwise, the high school student will not receive credit for the SCF course at the high school.  State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota conforms to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). No student grades are posted in any public manner; no grades are provided...
Sample 1See All (4)
Instructor Evaluation. The MCC Department Chair or designee will evaluate all Dual Enrollment faculties. This evaluation will involve a classroom visitation. In addition, all Dual Enrollment faculties will be asked to have their students complete an evaluation form during the latter part of the semester. Complete instructions will be given at that time.
Sample 1Sample 2
Instructor Evaluation. The SCF Department Chair or designee will evaluate all Dual Enrollment faculties. This evaluation will involve a classroom visitation. In addition, all Dual Enrollment faculties will be asked to have their students complete an evaluation form during the latter part of the semester. Complete instructions will be given at that time.
Sample 1
Instructor Evaluation. The institution paying the instructors will evaluate the instructor using its evaluation instrument in accordance with its policies and procedures. The other institution reserves the right to visit and observe the class.
Sample 1
Instructor Evaluation. All prospective instructor personnel shall be evaluated for technical and instructional proficiency, and validated by the contractor as meeting the Navy minimum standards as delineated in sections 4 and 5. This assessment shall be made by the ECS Training Officer, or any other government representative assigned to evaluate training delivery. In such cases, the Contract Site Lead will be notified immediately and further action will be coordinated between the Contract Site Lead, CENSECFOR Learning Site Director and/or CENSECFOR COR. In all cases, Government personnel shall ensure technical accuracy of material, and provide technical guidance to the contractor, if necessary, during course of instruction.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Instructor Evaluation 
Sample 1

Related to Instructor Evaluation

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.