Influencers Sample Clauses
The 'Influencers' clause defines the roles, responsibilities, and expectations for individuals or entities engaged to promote a product, service, or brand, typically through social media or other digital platforms. It outlines requirements such as content approval, disclosure of sponsored status, and adherence to applicable advertising regulations. This clause ensures that both parties understand the scope of the influencer's activities and helps prevent legal or reputational issues arising from non-compliance or misrepresentation.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Influencers. When analyzing a crowd of people, someone who is trying to be influential can be easily identified. There is a clear difference between someone speaking out to the crowd, as opposed to someone trying to listen, or someone who is simply trying to move past the person trying to gain their attention. On social media, finding an influencer requires looking for other factors then simply speaking out in the crowd, because everyone who participates in publishing posts would then have to be classified as an influencer. All posts are speaking out, and the users of social media could be considered a type of crowd. According to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “an influencer is a person who has the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behavior of someone or something” (p. 675). This ability to impact others can used as a tool for organizations to promote their messages and branding. In this case, the crowd could be millions of people at a single time, so the influence of these individuals is much less limited. With this broad spread of audience, geography is no longer a limiting factor for consumer behavior (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇, 2018). Online communities provide portals to instantaneously learn about various products and services. Influencers can then join these communities and engage with others to promote what they want. If a community doesn’t already exist for the specific niche the influencer is targeting, they can rally support from their followers and start their own community. This task can be difficult, especially with attention being so demanded from multiple other directions. According to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ -▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2019), There are three properties an influencer must fulfill. They must have credibility inside the group, are capable of being persuasive with other people (even if some disagreement occurs), and they can introduce new ideas that other components of the group support (p. 675). Influencers must be liked in their community, but also present themselves as credible sources to get recommendations, products and services from. To make their approach more impactful, influencers may rely on influence mechanisms. These mechanisms are most seen when product packaging uses character marketing among young children (▇▇▇▇, 2020). This type of marketing could be effective because of the underlying parasocial relationship that is formed. Children see these characters on packages, television, or social media and form an attachment an...
Influencers participation in the IHC is entirely voluntary. Influencer may end participation in the IHC at any time by taking all of the following actions, provided that Influencer may not leave the IHC until Influencer has completed her obligations under any Campaigns Influencer is participating in: notifying ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ of her intent to leave the IHC; removing the IHC badge from her blog and social media platforms; leaving the IHC Facebook group. Her Campus may remove Influencer from the IHC at any time for any or no reason upon immediate notice to Influencer.
Influencers. Seven women within the sample used social media platforms widely and engaged with hundreds or even thousands of other actors, with some becoming important influencers within the online jihadisphere. One example is ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, who operated the Twitter accounts “Fatayat Al Khilafah” and “Young Lioness”. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’ court filings detail her repeated endorsements of IS; her attempts to raise money for the movement; as well as extolling the virtues of martyrdom.158 An example of her output can be seen in this tweet on December 2, 2014: If we truly knew the realities ... we all would be ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to join our brothers in the front lines pray ALLAH accept us as shuhada [martyrs].159 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ clearly had influence, given that the filings also draw on conversations that she had with a number of important men, including radical preacher ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇),160 virtual entrepreneurs ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇),161 and ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇), the latter of whom she married online via Skype and intended to join in Raqqa before her arrest.162 The filings do not state how large her reach was but do suggest that she had a ‘large online following’.163 Given this, and her connection to key figures within the movement, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ should be seen as a key influencer. What is more, she seems to have achieved this entirely through the means of the Internet; the filings make no reference to any offline networks or activity and repeatedly iterate her online communications since entering the radical online milieu around 2010.164 A similar case is that of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, who posted on several different platforms including Facebook, Telegram, Google+, but was prolific on Twitter. As with ▇▇▇▇▇▇, the court filings lay out ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ post history, noting that her Twitter accounts were regularly suspended due to terms of service violations and that the FBI identified 97 different account IDs that she was using to post in support of IS.165 She also regularly changed her handles throughout the day.166 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ tweeted support for British convicted terrorists ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ when they were charged, as well as posts that were violent in nature, including the post mentioned in the radical content section in which she mocked the “Freedom of Speech Rally Round II” – the “first round” referring to the Garland, TX attack by ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ – by tweeting: 158 USA v. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Criminal Complaint. 159 USA v. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Criminal...
Influencers. Includes regulators, educators, elected officials, environmentalists, profes- sional/business groups, media, citizen interest groups, IEA Wind ExCo members, mem- bers of other IEA implementing agreements, and funding sources for participation in IEA wind activities.
Influencers agent agrees that any costs charged by Influencer’s agent bank associated with delivery of payment by ▇▇▇▇▇ to Influencer will be absorbed by the Influencer (i.e. Paypal fees, wire transfer fees, etc.) and that any costs charged by ▇▇▇▇▇’s bank associated with delivery of payment by Omnia to Influencer will be absorbed by Omnia.
Influencers relationship with the Company is that of an independent contractor, and nothing in this Agreement is intended to, or should be construed to, create a partnership, agency, joint venture, or employment relations hip. Influencer is solely responsible for, and will file, on a timely basis, all tax returns and payments required to be filed with, or made to, any federal, state or local tax authority with respect to the performance of services and receipt of fees under this Agreement. Influencer is solely responsible for, and must maintain adequate records of, expenses incurred in the course of performing services under this Agreement. No part of Influencer’s compensation will be subject to withholding by the Company for the payment of any social security, federal, state or any other employee payroll taxes with respect to any employee, contractor, or other individual used by Influencer to perform the Services. The Company will regularly report amounts paid to Influencer by filing Form 1099-MISC with the Internal Revenue Service as may be required by law and make any other reports as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Company under applicable laws.
Influencers. 6.1.1. Influencers should ensure the posts made are online of their respective social media accounts and shall not be deleted post the campaign.