In-Licensed Patents Sample Clauses

In-Licensed Patents. With respect to any aspect of the In-Licensed Patents for which Codexis has less than fully exclusive, worldwide rights (e.g., co-exclusive, non-exclusive, limited territorial or otherwise restricted rights), the licenses provided in Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and 3.5.6 shall be limited to the scope of those rights that Codexis Controls.

In-Licensed Patents. It is understood and agreed that, with respect to Patents within the Santarus Patents that are owned by a Third Party and licensed to Santarus, the provisions set forth in this Section 8.4 shall apply only to the extent consistent with Santarus’ rights under the applicable in-license for such Santarus Patents.

In-Licensed Patents. With regard to any Subject AnaptysBio Patent licensed to Client pursuant to Section 4.3(a) that is licensed to AnaptysBio by [*]. Subject to mutual execution by the parties of a sublicense agreement with respect to an In-Licensed Patent, AnaptysBio shall be responsible for any payments that may be due to Licensor(s) as a result of Client’s practice of the invention(s) claimed by such In-Licensed Patent within the scope of such sublicense.

In-Licensed Patents. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 8.3 to the contrary, the Parties acknowledge that certain Genethon Background Patent Rights are in-licensed from Third Parties and consequently that the rights and obligations of the Parties set out in this Section 8.3 remain in any case subject to the terms of the license agreement with such Third Parties and to the legal rights of such Third Parties. As a consequence, neither Party shall be in breach of any of its obligations under this Section 8.3 to the extent it is unable to comply with such obligation as a consequence of the legal rights of the Third Party licensor under the applicable license agreement.

In-Licensed Patents. With respect to this Section 8, “Protalix Patent Rights” shall include Patent Rights that are Controlled by Protalix or any of its Affiliates pursuant to a Third Party License (i.e., such Patent Rights are not owned by Protalix or any of its Affiliates) only if [***]

In-Licensed Patents. With respect to any Licensed Patent that is licensed to Tarsus from a Third Party, to the extent Tarsus has the right to do so, Tarsus will cooperate with Lian to enforce, such Licensed Patents in the Field and in the Territory in the same manner as set forth in this Section 14.2. As between Tarsus and Lian, any recoveries from enforcement of such Licensed Patents owned by a Third Party shall be shared in accordance with Section 14.2.4, after deducting from such recoveries any amounts owed to the Third Party licensor for such enforcement.

In-Licensed Patents. (a) Pharmstandard acknowledges that: (i) pursuant to Section 6.2(a) of the KHK Agreement, KHK shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Listed AVEO Patents and any other Licensed Patents that fall within the definition of Kirin Product Invention Patents (as defined in the KHK Agreement) on a worldwide basis, with AVEO having step-in (ii) pursuant to Section 6.2(c) of the KHK Agreement, KHK shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of any Licensed Patents that fall within the definition of Jointly Owned Product Patents (as defined in the KHK Agreement) in the KHK Territory, and, as between KHK and AVEO, AVEO shall have the first right and responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Licensed Patents in the Pharmstandard Territory, subject to (A) keeping the other party reasonably informed with respect to such activities, consulting with the other party on such matters (including with respect to final abandonment of any claims), and reasonably considering the other party’s comments, (B) reasonable cooperation and mutual agreement on (and sharing costs equally with respect to) filings that are applicable to both the KHK Territory and the Pharmstandard Territory, and (C) the other party having the right to step-in on prosecution and maintenance if the original prosecuting party determines to abandon or not maintain any such Licensed Patent in the would-be-abandoning party’s territory; (iii) pursuant to Section 6.2(d) of the KHK Agreement, KHK and AVEO have agreed to confer and agree upon which party shall prosecute and/or maintain any Joint Other Invention Patent (as defined in the KHK Agreement). AVEO shall not undertake such conference or agreement with KHK with respect to any Licensed Patent without the Parties’ mutual agreement (which agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed by either Party); (iv) if AVEO or Pharmstandard, as applicable, does not bring action to prevent or ▇▇▇▇▇ Competitive Infringement of any Licensed Patents within [**] days (or [**] days in the case of an action brought under the ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ Act or any ex-U.S. equivalent of the ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ Act recognized by Applicable Law) after notification thereof to or by such Party pursuant to Section 5.4(a) above, then KHK shall have a back-up right under Section 6.5(b)(ii) of the KHK Agreement to bring, at its own expense, an appropriate action in the Pharm...

In-Licensed Patents. If there are at any time any Aveo Patents that are in-licensed by Aveo instead of owned by Aveo (or an Aveo Affiliate), then Section 6.2(b) shall apply to the prosecution of such Patents in the same way as if they were Aveo Patents owned by Aveo, to the full extent Aveo has prosecution rights under the agreement by which Aveo received its license rights to such Aveo Patents that are in-licensed by Aveo instead of owned by Aveo (or an Aveo Affiliate), and to the full extent permitted by such agreement. If there are at any time any Listed Kirin Patents or Kirin Product Invention Patents that are in-licensed by Kirin instead of owned by Kirin (or any Kirin Affiliate), then Section 6.2(a) shall apply to the prosecution of such Patents in the same way as if they were Listed Kirin Patents or Kirin Product Invention Patents owned by Kirin, to the full extent Kirin has prosecution rights under the agreement by which Kirin received its license rights to such Patents that are in-licensed by Kirin instead of owned by Kirin (or any Kirin Affiliate), and to the full extent permitted by such agreement.

In-Licensed Patents. Each Party’s rights under this Article 9 with respect to the prosecution and enforcement of any ARS Patent that is in-licensed by ARS pursuant to an ARS Third Party License shall be subject to the rights retained by the applicable licensor with respect to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense of such Patent. To the extent that pursuant to any ARS Third Party License any consent or cooperation of any Third Party (including any joinder as a party plaintiff in any Infringement) is reasonably required for Company to exercise or receive the benefit of any of its rights under this Article 9, as requested by Company, ARS will use reasonable good faith efforts to obtain such consent or cooperation from such Third Party, as applicable.