Implementation & Performance. The optimisation is implemented in the HiP-HOPS tool, building on its existing support for optimisation and the prototype ASIL decomposition algorithm described earlier. As a result, performance between the standard exhaustive algorithm and the optimisation approaches can be directly compared. The central advantage of the optimisation approach is that it does not require HiP-HOPS to consider every possible solution, meaning that it performs much, much quicker; the trade-off is that it will not discover every solution in each case. The aim is simply to obtain a reasonable number of good, valid solutions. For the small six component example described earlier, both the exhaustive algorithm and the optimisation algorithms are very quick (<1 second), and in the case of the optimisation, it also finds the valid solution. For larger examples, the exhaustive algorithm performs much worse, but will usually find all valid solutions eventually (unless the algorithm runs out of memory or is cancelled early). The optimisation algorithms scale far better but are not guaranteed to find any valid solutions, although the penalty-based approach has thus far been more successful. In one medium-sized example, the penalty-based optimisation took 18 seconds versus the exhaustive approach’s 18 hours, but the exhaustive algorithm did find all 50 valid solutions whereas the optimisation found only one. Continued testing and development is required to try to improve the success rate of the optimisation algorithms. Their advantage in performance is clear as optimisation is far more scalable than standard exhaustive approaches; however, to be more practical, they need tweaking further to yield more valid solutions. In addition, further developments of the standard exhaustive algorithm may also produce good results, although it is doubtful that it will ever be fast enough to be applied to large systems.
Implementation & Performance. Xxxxx Cloud Inc. will make the Services available to Customer promptly after this Agreement becomes binding upon the parties and, subject to Customer’s payment of the Fees (as defined in Section 3) and the other terms and conditions of this Agreement, for the duration of the Term. The parties agree that Fees (as defined in Section 3) shall begin to accrue upon the Services being made available to Customer and shall become due in accordance with Section 3.
Implementation & Performance. A. Project HOPE 196. Project HOPE's implementation performance was highly satisfactory. With the exception of a small number of research activities and the constraints imposed on PMTCT and VCT activities due to lack of government protocols and guidelines, all planned activities were carried out. Between 1997 and February 2003, the project conducted 181 planned training activities, which had a total of 4,084 participants. Planned construction of district health staff houses and Under Five outreach clinics was completed, and facilities are in use. GIK supplies and equipment were distributed to hospitals and health centers; trained community volunteer supply and equipment kits were distributed to volunteers.
