Implementation and performance Clause Samples
Implementation and performance. For certain languages targeted by PANACEA, standalone tools for different processing stages are not available. Instead, pipelines or comprehensive one-does-it-all tools cover all processing stages up to and including syntactic analysis (e.g. the Italian SynSg System, or the Charniak and RASP parsers). Almost half of the tools are implemented in Java, with C/C++ coming second together with some hybrid systems (Figure 2) involving Perl, Python, etc. More than half of the tools claim to be OS independent or, at least, operating on both Windows and Linux (Figure 3). Proprietary 38% GPL 16% Open source 9% 15 ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/TR/ws-gloss/ Hybrid: 22% Linux; 13% Java; 48% Window s; 32% C/C++; 22% Other; 9% Figure 2 Programming Languages Figure 3 Operating Systems 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 5,00 0,00 It is not easy to compare the processing speed of different categories of NLP tools, especially if pipelines of tools instead of standalone versions are documented. Depending on the perspective, the majority of most basic tools (i.e. up to lemmatization) seem to perform relatively fast (Figure 5). Nevertheless, higher level tools, like for example constituency parsers for EN, are much slower in comparison (Figure 5). ▇▇▇▇ Processing Tool ▇▇▇▇ POS Tagger ILSP SST ILSP FBT ILSP Lemmatizer ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ILSP MENER LT-Lemmatiser LT-Decomposer LT-MonoTermExtract TreeTagger Charniak ▇▇▇▇▇ Berkeley Stanford
Implementation and performance. Responsibilities
1) The Ministry of Economic Affairs requires regular updates on the progress of the Green Deals. RVO (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) is also monitoring the progress annually. The interviewees pointed out that due to the voluntary nature of the Green Deals, there are no consequences in case of non-compliance. Every participant has the right to leave the Green Deal at any given point and this will be indicated on Green Deal’s website. Thus, leaving the Green Deal might attract negative publicity and media attention. In fact, this has never happened so far for the CPGD as all of the participants are highly motivated. The project team is also responsible for sharing best practices and innovations. For the CPGD six sessions are organized annually. These sessions are called com- munity of practice and their aim is to provide a platform for exchanging infor- mation and experience. According to the interviewees, participants in the CPGD receive a newsletter containing information about where and when the next com- munity of practice should be organized. During the interviews, it was high- lighted that community of practice is organized only for collaboration Green Deals with larger number of members. Not only the project team provides infor- mation on matters related to the Green Deal but also organizes few workshops on specific topics related to participants’ experience, challenges and solutions. In the beginning of the CPGD, a training day was organized for all of the partici- pants. MVO Netherlands (CSR Netherlands) has the responsibility of publishing the results and other relevant information about the CPGD on their website. For instance, the steps towards circular economy are available on their website. In addition, the interviewees indicated that in addition to the project team, RVO (Netherlands Enterprise Agency) is also responsible of sharing best practices. According to the respondents, it is participants’ responsibility to enter their progress in the ICT platform. Once a year the participants are requested to report their progress according to the initially agreed goals. This information is usually gathered through an excel sheet which the participants fill-in and send back to RVO (Netherlands Enterprise Agency). Participants have the freedom and flexi- bility to decide by what means to reach the goals of the Green Deal. In the Circu- lar Procurement Green Deal, the only requirement for the participants is to start two circular procurem...