Common use of Illustrative Example Clause in Contracts

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 M) in stand- ard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- er). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative Example, Phase 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- kpE = 0.455 (kp)SHW taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to As determined, kpE is the net environ- mental photoreaction rate constant. It applies to clear sky conditions and is valid for predicting surface photoreaction rates in an average humic containing freshwater body. It is the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 PYR] = 0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 PNAP] = 1.00 × 10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 1.53 × 10¥5 M) in stand- ard standard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- erbuffer). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥51.53 × 10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative Example, Phase 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 PYR] = 0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 PNAP] = 1.00 × 10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 1.53 × 10¥5 M) in stand- ard standard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- erbuffer). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥51.53 × 10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 370 TABLE 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative ExampleCHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE, Phase PHASE 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 1.53 × 10¥5 M) in stand- ard standard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- erbuffer). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 370 TABLE 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative ExampleCHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE, Phase PHASE 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- kpE = 0.455 (kp)SHW taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to As determined, kpE is the net environ- mental photoreaction rate constant. It applies to clear sky conditions and is valid for predicting surface photoreaction rates in an average humic containing freshwater body. It is the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 PYR] = 0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 PNAP] = 1.00 × 10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 1.53 × 10¥5 M) in stand- ard standard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- erbuffer). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥51.53 × 10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative Example, Phase 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 d–1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 d–1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 d–1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 M) in stand- ard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- er). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. Table 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative Example, Phase 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNWAo ) ], Pn(Ao /A370/A ), and Pn(Co/ Pn(C / 370 370 o given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/

Illustrative Example. (i) From Phase 2 testing, under paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section, chemical A was found to have a photolysis rate constant, (kp)SHW′ of 0.30 d¥1 in fall in round tubes at latitude 33° N. Using Table 1 under paragraph (d)(1)(vii) of this section for 30° N, the nearest decadic latitude, a fall value of ka equal to 333 d¥1 is found for PNAP. Substitution of (kp)SHW and ka into Equation 15 under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section gives [PYR] = 0.0242 M. This is the concentration of pyridine that gives an actinometer rate constant of 0.30 d¥1 in round tubes in fall at this latitude. (ii) The actinometer solution was made up by adding a volume of pyri- dine (1.95 mL) calculated from equation 16 under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this sec- tion to a 1 liter volumetric flask con- taining 1.00 mL of 1.00 × 10¥2 M PNAP in acetonitrile. The flask was filled to the mark with distilled water to give final concentrations of [PYR]=0.0242 M and [PNAP]=1.00×10¥5 M. Ten tubes of each of the following solutions were placed in the photolysis rack at 1,200 hours on day zero: (A) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5 1.53 × 10¥5 M) in stand- ard standard SHW (0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buff- erbuffer). (B) Chemical A (1.53×10¥5), in 0.010 M, pH 7 phosphate buffer. (C) SHW standard solution diluted with water 0.90 to 1.00 to match solu- tion A. (D) PNAP/PYR actinometer solution. Ten additional foil-wrapped controls of each mixture were taped to the bottom of the rack. (iii) The test chemical had been placed in category B, Table 2 under the paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, on the basis of its Phase 2 rate constant under paragraph (c) of this section. Ac- cordingly, two tubes of each irradiated solution and two tubes of each blank solution were removed at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days at 1,200 hours. The averaged ▇▇▇- lytical results obtained at the end of the experiment are shown in the fol- lowing Table 3. 370 Table 3—Chemical Analytical Results for Illustrative Example, Phase 3 Day 105[C]SHW, M 105[C]W, M ASHW370 105 [PNAP], M 0 ...................................................................................... 1.53 1.53 0.0500 1.00 1 ...................................................................................... 1.03 1.40 0.0470 0.810 2 ...................................................................................... 0.760 1.30 0.0440 0.690 4 ...................................................................................... 0.300 1.01 0.0370 0.380 8 ...................................................................................... 0.130 0.800 0.0320 0.220 Data for solutions A through D are A o 370 )SNW], Pn(Ao /A370), and Pn(Co/ given in column 2 through 5, respec- tively. No significant chemical loss was found in the dark controls. (A) From these items the functions Pn(Co/C) SNW′ Pn(Co/C)W′ [1—(A370/