HABITAT CONSERVATION COMMITMENTS Sample Clauses
The Habitat Conservation Commitments clause outlines the obligations of parties to protect, maintain, or restore natural habitats affected by their activities. Typically, this clause requires parties to implement specific conservation measures, such as preserving certain areas, restoring degraded land, or funding habitat protection projects. Its core function is to ensure that environmental impacts are mitigated and biodiversity is preserved, addressing the problem of habitat loss or degradation resulting from development or other operations.
HABITAT CONSERVATION COMMITMENTS. Each of the Parties is bound by certain guiding agency requirements which establish their mission, goals, and responsibilities while also managing and conserving the habitat of various species (e.g., the gopher tortoise) in the Southeastern U.S. This section addresses general measures that will be taken by the Parties to conserve gopher tortoise and its habitat at the landscape and local level. Best practices for habitat management, monitoring, and translocation of tortoises are contained in Appendix B.
HABITAT CONSERVATION COMMITMENTS. Each of the Parties to this CA is bound by certain guiding agency requirements which establish their mission, goals, and responsibilities while also managing and conserving the habitat of various land snails in the Pinaleño Mountains. This section addresses general measures that will be taken by the Parties to conserve the covered species and their habitat at the landscape and local level. Best practices for habitat management and monitoring of land snails are also outlined in the Stressor/Conservation Measure Matrix (Appendix A). The Parties agree to jointly identify and pursue appropriate partnership opportunities in support of the conservation measures enumerated in this CA. To the extent authorized by law, the Parties to this agreement will continue or begin implementation of the identified conservation measures, utilizing their own resources, including expenditures of their own funds. Each Party to this agreement, as described below, is dedicated to eliminating or reducing threats to the covered species. However, emergency actions, Congressionally-mandated actions, or future funding allocations could result in a Party’s inability to conduct one or more of the proposed conservation measures as described. These circumstances are examples of what is meant when a Party states an action will be conducted “when or where feasible” or “where practicable.” The language is not meant to indicate a lack of commitment by the Party(ies), but to candidly note that there may be instances where due to circumstances beyond a Party’s control, conservation measures or commitments need to be modified or other means of management identified. If Parties need assistance in developing additional or new proposed conservation measures this could be done in cooperation with the PLSWG to ensure that land snail conservation occurs as intended in the CA.
HABITAT CONSERVATION COMMITMENTS. Each of the Parties to this CCA is bound by certain guiding agency requirements which establish their mission, goals, and responsibilities while also managing and conserving the habitat of various species (including PYTH) in Arizona. This section addresses general measures that will be taken by the Parties to conserve PYTH and its habitat at the landscape and local level. Best practices for habitat management and monitoring of springsnails are also outlined in Stressor/Conservation Measure Matrix (Appendix A). The Parties to this agreement will continue or begin to put into action all identified conservation measures and will obtain the necessary funding and authorization to implement the PYTH CCA. Each Party to this agreement, as described below, is dedicated to eliminating or reducing threats to the PYTH. However, emergency actions, Congressionally-mandated actions, or future funding allocations could result in a Party’s inability to conduct one or more of the proposed conservation measures as described. These circumstances are examples of what is meant when a Party states an action will be conducted “when or where feasible” or “where practicable.” The language is not meant to indicate a lack of commitment by the Party(ies), but to candidly note that there may be instances where due to circumstances beyond a Party’s control, conservation measures or commitments need to be modified or other means of management identified. If Parties need assistance in developing additional or new proposed conservation measures this could be done in cooperation with the HSWG to ensure that PYTH conservation occurs as intended in the CCA.