Common use of Grounds for refusal Clause in Contracts

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial design from EUIPO, (11) 000864764-0064, deposit date (00) 00.00.0000, publication date (00) 00.00.0000, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KG, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 00, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different its significant features differ only in non-essential details from the overall impression produced on such a user by features of the industrial design from EUIPO, EUIPO (11) 000864764002815399-00640001, deposit date (00) 00.00.0000, publication date (00) 00.00.0000, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KGLoxtop kft., Xxxxxxxxxxxx XxxXxxxxx Xxxx xx 75. 002/2, X-00000 Welzheim1114, ALEMANIA. Budapest (HU) (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different its significant features differ only in non-essential details from the overall impression produced on such a user by features of the industrial design from EUIPOfrom: - UA, (11) 000864764-006435402, deposit date (00) 00.00.00000000.00.00, publication date (00) 00.00.00000000.00.00, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KGТОВАРИСТВО З ОБМЕЖНОЮ ВIДПОВIДАЛЬНIСТЮ «АКАМА» xxx.Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx0. 00м. Днiпро, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. 49022 (UA) (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design designs Nos. 6, 7 applied for registration does do not meet the provisions of the Article 8 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design Designs No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different their significant features differ only in non-essential details from the overall impression produced on such a user by features of the industrial design designs from EUIPOWIPO, (11) 000864764-0064DM/208 621 (Nos. 27, 28), deposit date (00) 00.00.00000000.00.00, publication date (00) 00.00.00000000.00.00, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KGRENAULT s.a.s., Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 0000/00 xxxx xx Xxxxx, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. 92100 BOULOGNE- BILLANCOURT (FR) (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )).

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial design from EUIPOPL, registration number 20029 (11) 000864764-0064No. 2), deposit date (00) 00.00.000015.04.2013, publication date (00) 00.00.000028.11.2013, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KGMULTIFARB SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 00Rzeszów, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. PL (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) ))

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design designs no. 1, 2, 3, applied for registration does do not meet the provisions of the Article 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial design designs from EUIPOWIPO, (11) 000864764-0064DM/081890, designs no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, deposit date (00) 00.00.0000, publication date (00) 00.00.0000, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Intersnack Group GmbH + & Co. KG, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 00Xxxxx-Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx 0, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA00000 Xxxxxxxxxx (DE). (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )

Grounds for refusal. The industrial design designs applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 7 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because theirs significant features are identical with the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different from the overall impression produced on such a user by features of the industrial design designs from EUIPO, (11) 000864764-0064WIPO registration number DM/207823, deposit date (00) 00.00.00002019.12.13, publication date (00) 00.00.00002020.06.19, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KGRENAULT s.a.s. 00/00 xxxx xx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 00, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. 92100 BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT (FR) (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )