General Observations. All groups Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors What training have assessors received? Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3 Guidelines for Review Reporting INTERNATIONAL COMPETENCY REVIEW REPORT <insert name of competency agreement> Authorized Member under review: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM: Name: Authorized Member Affiliation Team Leader: Team Member: Team Member:
General Observations. The construction site had been under normal operation during the noise monitoring period and no unusual operation was observed. Traffic noise had been noticed at the monitoring location during the noise monitoring period.
General Observations. The awarded bidder(s) shall be responsible for providing a copy of the report to each respective County departments’ Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Zoo-Miami Lift Stations will design a “Lift Station Maintenance Report for Zoo-Miami Stations” to be used by the bidder for Group 1; copies of these reports will remain at the Zoo-Miami stations.
General Observations. All groups Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? • Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? • Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? Assessors • What training have assessors received? • Was it sufficient? Structure of Assessment • Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? • Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments? GUIDELINE ANNEX 3
General Observations. As expected, all the participating countries have adopted or are in the process of adopting relevant national strategies, which are also coherent with the EU strategies. Nevertheless, there is a difference between “adopting” the strategy and “implementing” it. The implementation phase is a step further and seems successful in Spain, Poland, in Slovenia only partially. The result of this fact is the lack of an efficient system approach to the UBC support.
General Observations. Very roughly put, CA displays a subject agreement affix on the complementiser in em- bedded clauses with the verb in final position. For the time being, the term Complemen- tiser Agreement will be used following traditional generative terminology. However, it is important to note that the relevant morpheme in GD cannot only be observed on com- plementisers as such but basically on any element7 introducing the embedded clause (cf. also Xxxx 2005). Hence, complementiser is to be understood as denoting the C-domain rather than referring to a certain class of elements. Being aware of this inaccuracy, I will for the time being nevertheless continue to use the term CA with respect to the data presented, as linguists are familiar with the notion and hence able to connect it to the relevant phenomenon. The following very stable facts can be observed in verb-final clauses:
General Observations. Generally, the SBAs we found have individual identifying characteristics and are well distinguishable from each other as shown in most of the value distributions of the boxplots. We found seven SBA located in the abyss and deep sea (SBAs I, II, III, V, VI, VII and VIII) and two that define coastal and (deeper) shelf areas (SBAs IV and IX). Many of the identified areas seem strongly impacted by deep water currents such as the NADW and the AABW. We also observed a separation into a Northern and a Southern hemisphere, which could also be related to bottom currents and water formation areas. This is underpinned by the expert knowledge based GOODS classification whose authors also found a strong separation into North and South Atlantic (Table 4, UNESCO, 2009; Morato et al., 2021). SBA II sort of sticks out being mainly formed by the topographic variables depth, slope, TRI and TPI, following the MAR as well as steep continental slopes, including seamount, ridge and trench areas (e.g. Walvis Ridge). All other SBAs do not seem to be too much related to topography, which is in contrast to Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx (2009), whose seascapes seem to be mostly defined by geomorphologic variables (i.e. slope) as they did not take into account currents for example. Some of the SBAs seem harder to distinguish regarding the parameters in the boxplots and their geographic coverage. For example, SBA VI and SBA VIII have quite similar boxplots for the hydrographic parameters and also slope, TPI and TRI are somewhat corresponding. Both are mixed SBAs in a sense that they are defined by both morphologic and hydrographic parameters. Both cover the centre part of the Atlantic from south to north, with SBA VIII covering a slightly narrower region around the MAR, especially in the North Atlantic. The two major differences are depth and oxygen, whereby SBA VI covers deeper areas containing more O2 due to the influence of NABW. The influence of deep currents is noticed in many of the identified SBAs and along with topography, those seem to be the two key factors thriving the deep sea environment. To find out whether those are the only major influencing parameters, a more detailed assessment is necessary on those mixed SBAs to make finer separations. This could be a nested, hierarchical approach which separates morphological, chemical, hydrographical and biologic components of those SBAs and classifies them again according to those components in a second step. Consulting higher resolution da...
General Observations. All data sources showed positive sentiment from a majority of both the Coalition of Peaks and Government Parties that, after two years, the Partnership is progressing, yet with significant opportunities for strengthening. Importantly, opportunities for strengthening are especially apparent at the jurisdictional level. There was some disagreement about the rate of progress of the Success Indicators. This may be attributable to the various ways Parties manage relationships in their respective jurisdictions. Survey results showed some disagreement between Government Parties and the Peaks, regarding the progress of Success Indicators. While there was a trend toward agreement for Government Parties, there was a disparity of opinion between the Peaks, with approximately half trending toward agreement and half trending toward disagreement. Overall the survey indicated an improvement in progress since the 2020 Health Check. The pulse check exercise, conducted in the workshop, highlighted that the Partnership generally supports equal participation. In comparison, the principles of shared decision-making and increased Aboriginal and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Islander agency were supported to some degree, with opportunity for improvement. Analysis across all data sources highlighted broad agreement that the following factors demonstrate maturation of the Partnership: • A solid operating base to set agendas and have quality discussions between the Parties • Established relationships between Peaks and Government department heads, beyond Indigenous affairs portfolios, leading to a positive change in Government Party behaviours – including better understanding of the Partnership • The Partnership is well structured, and the Coalition of Peaks generally feel well informed • Significant increases in demonstrated commitment by all Parties. “The practice of doing partnership under the National Agreement is taking shape. The standards of joint chairing, joint agenda setting, respectful debate and a commitment to actions is spread across levels of governance.” – Government Party Survey Participant
General Observations. EVALUATIONS Classroom teachers and support personnel shall be observed/evaluated during each school year in accordance with the procedures and criteria set forth in this Article. Every employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory based upon the observation/evaluation criteria (see Appendix D) shall be placed in a probationary status no later than February 1 and shall be given until May 1 to demonstrate improvement in his/her area(s) of deficiency.
General Observations. The activities on quality in ICBS have been ongoing since the last twinning project, and the participating staff is highly motivated and engaged. There is an increase in awareness on quality, and progress is being made in many areas. Great plans are in place. There is a tendency for subject matter domains to be like islands, each working in their own way and thus, are little inclined to follow overall institutional standards. However, during and after the mission a great deal of positive feedback was received and participants expressed that the exercise gave them a much better understanding of the CoP principles and what they, as a unit, can do in order to meet the principles of the CoP.
