General Evaluation Protocol Sample Clauses

General Evaluation Protocol. All employees may be required to complete a fitness evaluation every two (2) years. If required, employees will be given notice of the testing requirement and the components of the test at least ninety (90) days in advance. The fitness evaluation may consist of a measure of the employee’s muscle strength (e.g., arms, legs, and hands), muscle power (e.g., vertical jump), muscle endurance (e.g., push up/pull up/sit up/wall sit or squat test), flexibility (e.g., sit & reach) and cardiovascular or aerobic capacity. Prior to the employee’s scheduled evaluation, the employee may be required to complete a risk assessment questionnaire. This questionnaire will initially be reviewed by the testing agency that will determine the appropriate evaluation protocol. When the employee is determined fit to undergo the evaluation, such evaluation will be conducted in private while the employee is on duty at predetermined dates identified by the Employer. Employees will follow the instructions given to them regarding the evaluation. An employee may be excused from taking the evaluation on the scheduled date if it falls on the date of the employee’s scheduled vacation or if the employee requests to be excused due to an existing illness or injury. In cases where such existing illness or injury is not incurred in the line of duty, the limited duty and administrative leave provisions set forth below shall not be applicable. The evaluation shall be rescheduled as soon as possible by the Employer after the employee’s illness or injury has healed. The evaluation will result in the preparation of a report to the employee of their fitness level relative to fire fighters of like age and gender from a national test sample and, where appropriate, the preparation of a recommended regimen by an exercise physiologist for the purpose of assisting the employee in improving their fitness. The Employer will receive an aggregate summary of the fitness level of all employees relative to Firefighters of like age and gender from a national test sample. Data from employees who participate in an alternative method of evaluation (e.g. step-test or predicted formula) will result in the preparation of a report to the Employer describing the total number of employees evaluated by each alternative method. No individual data, such as the employee’s name, age, gender and evaluation outcome will be provided or made accessible to the Employer.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to General Evaluation Protocol

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.