Common use of Funding framework Clause in Contracts

Funding framework. There is a need for higher levels of investment in rural areas to overcome historical backlogs while using cost-effective models of infrastructure and service delivery. In addition funding models should allow diverse delivery mechanisms including non- government, social coops, private sector etc where government is a funder, sets standards and coordinates, rather than actually deliver services. If this model is expanded it will provide much greater impact on the local economy. Sector departments will be expected to provide both financial and technical support for interventions directed in line with their mandates and identified sub outputs and activities. External stakeholders will be mobilized to provide additional financial resources. Funding to deliver water and sanitation infrastructure is available through the MIG, PIG and BIG in the existing budgets but need to be aligned according to priority infrastructure needs. However, it is limited in its attempt to address all existing backlogs. This gap will be partly filled through the mobilization of private sector funding by municipalities with support from the SPV. A detailed cost analysis needs to be made to confirm the quantum of funding required with the relevant sector department. Support should be provided towards the accelerated refuse and waste management implementation. Municipalities need to prioritise waste management projects in their three year budgets.

Funding framework. There is a need for higher levels of investment in rural areas to overcome historical backlogs while using cost-effective models of infrastructure and service delivery. In addition funding models should allow diverse delivery mechanisms including non- non-government, social coops, private sector etc where government is a funder, sets standards and coordinates, rather than actually deliver services. If this model is expanded it will provide much greater impact on the local economy. Sector departments will be expected to provide both financial and technical support for interventions directed in line with their mandates and identified sub outputs and activities. External stakeholders will be mobilized to provide additional financial resources. Funding to deliver water and sanitation infrastructure is available through the MIG, PIG and BIG in the existing budgets but need to be aligned according to priority infrastructure needs. However, it is limited in its attempt to address all existing backlogs. This gap will be partly filled through the mobilization of private sector funding by municipalities with support from the SPV. A detailed cost analysis needs to be made to confirm the quantum of funding required with the relevant sector department. Support should be provided towards the accelerated refuse and waste management implementation. Municipalities need to prioritise waste management projects in their three year budgets.