Functional Suitability Sample Clauses

Functional Suitability. Degree to which a product or system provides functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified conditions. Measurement function: FS=( X+Y+Z) / 3( where X,Y,Z are the scores computed as in the following FS = Functional Suitability
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Functional Suitability. Degree to which a product or system provides functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified conditions
Functional Suitability. In order to test the functional suitability of the implemented functionalities, the NOMAD platform has been used by developers and IT experts to identify the prototype behaviour with respect the planned one and to check whether the user requirements, as they are presented in the NOMAD Deliverable D2.2[2], and the functional requirements, as they are presented in the NOMAD Deliverable D6.1[1], have been addressed. The testing process follows a number of test use cases, which are iteratively repeated. These tests should be successfully accomplished from the NOMAD platform and in all iterations they should provide the same results. The test cases relate to the NOMAD requirements and for each of them the result of the testing process is reported. For all the test cases, the http client of the NOMAD platform prototype has been used as the method for observation testing, while direct access to the logs of the NOMAD Server ensure that the intended use of the functionalities is performed (with no programming level exceptions to be occurred).
Functional Suitability. This dimension aims at the right or specified results for the required degree of precision [80]. As QualiMaster focuses on data (stream) processing, functional suitability consists of data-related parameters (REQ-A-6, REQ-A-7), in particular (to a certain degree) domain-specific quality parameters. In QualiMaster, functional suitability specifically addresses the quality of the outcome at the individual data processing algorithms (potentially considered as subsequent input) as well as the overall outcome of a pipeline at its sinks. Due to the results of the quality survey, the functional suitability dimension of the QualiMaster quality taxonomy consists of: • Accuracy according to [143], i.e., the integrity of the data and measures the extent to which data is correct, reliable and certified free of error. On the one side, this includes the accuracy / integrity of the source data. On the other side, we use this property to measure the accuracy of the data processing and analysis output. Both sides address REQ-A-6. The measurement of the data accuracy can vary from an algorithm to another, in particular across different research fields, depending on the concrete definition of the accuracy of the specific algorithms. In particular, we aim at two measurements, namely the o Confidence or precision value of a prediction or a classification algorithm o Error rate of an approximation algorithm representing the correctness of the processing. In particular, integrating the different notions of confidence among data stream processing and social web analysis, e.g., on pipeline level is a challenge (Challenge C6) as we discuss further in Section 6.3. • Believability is the extent to which data is accepted or regarded as true, real and credible in [143]. In general, the importance and the potential impact of the content of social media streams varies a lot depending on the source. We measure the data creditability based on the estimation of the creditability of the source or the authors of the content. This can be achieved, for example, by manually or automatically evaluating the popularity of a specific source (e.g., blog) or by measuring the influence of users in social networks, and taking this measurement as a basis for filtering the user-generated content in these networks. • Relevancy characterizes whether data is helpful for the task at hand [143]. This is in particular important for the (integration of) the social media analysis algorithms. One of the challenges...

Related to Functional Suitability

  • Suitability The Dealer Manager will offer Shares, and in its agreement with each Soliciting Dealer will require that the Soliciting Dealer offer Shares, only to Persons that it has reasonable grounds to believe meet the financial qualifications set forth in the Prospectus or in any suitability letter or memorandum sent to it by the Company and will only make offers to Persons in the states in which it is advised in writing by the Company that the Shares are qualified for sale or that such qualification is not required. In offering Shares, the Dealer Manager will comply, and in its agreements with the Soliciting Dealers, the Dealer Manager will require that the Soliciting Dealers comply, with the provisions of all applicable rules and regulations relating to suitability of investors, including without limitation the FINRA Conduct Rules and the provisions of Article III.C. of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts of the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (the “NASAA Guidelines”). The Dealer Manager agrees that in recommending the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering to an investor, the Dealer Manager and each Person associated with the Dealer Manager that make such recommendation shall have, and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree with respect to investors to which it makes a recommendation shall agree that it shall have, reasonable grounds to believe, on the basis of information obtained from the investor concerning the investor’s investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs, and any other information known by the Dealer Manager, the Person associated with the Dealer Manager or the Soliciting Dealer that: (i) the investor is or will be in a financial position appropriate to enable the investor to realize to a significant extent the benefits described in the Prospectus, including the tax benefits where they are a significant aspect of the Company; (ii) the investor has a fair market net worth sufficient to sustain the risks inherent in the program, including loss of investment and lack of liquidity; and (iii) an investment in the Shares offered in the Primary Offering is otherwise suitable for the investor. The Dealer Manager agrees as to investors to whom it makes a recommendation with respect to the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering (and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree, with respect to investors to whom it makes such recommendations) to maintain in the files of the Dealer Manager (or the Soliciting Dealer, as applicable) documents disclosing the basis upon which the determination of suitability was reached as to each investor. In making the determinations as to financial qualifications and as to suitability required by the NASAA Guidelines, the Dealer Manager and Soliciting Dealers may rely on (A) representations from investment advisers who are not affiliated with a Soliciting Dealer, banks acting as trustees or fiduciaries, and (B) information it has obtained from a prospective investor, including such information as the investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs of the Person or any other information known by the Dealer Manager (or Soliciting Dealer, as applicable), after due inquiry. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Dealer Manager shall not, and each Soliciting Dealer shall agree not to, execute any transaction in the Company in a discretionary account without prior written approval of the transaction by the customer.

  • Habitability Tenant has inspected the Premises and fixtures (or has had the Premises inspected on behalf of Tenant), and acknowledges that the Premises are in a reasonable and acceptable condition of habitability for their intended use, and the agreed lease payments are fair and reasonable. If the condition changes so that, in Tenant’s opinion, the habitability and rental value of the Premises are adversely affected, Tenant shall promptly provide reasonable notice to Landlord.

  • Functional Requirements Applications must implement controls that protect against known vulnerabilities and threats, including Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Top 10 Risks and denial of service (DDOS) attacks.

  • Operational Flexibility Each designated airline may, on any or all flights and at its option:

  • MWBE COMPLIANCE 2.17.1 Contractor shall comply with the City’s Minority and Women Business Enterprise (“MWBE”) programs as set out in Chapter 15, Article V of the City of Houston Code of Ordinances. Contractor shall make good faith efforts to award subcontracts or supply agreements in at least % of the value of this Agreement to MWBEs. Contractor acknowledges that it has reviewed the requirements for good faith efforts on file with the City’s Office of Business Opportunities (“OBO”) and will comply with them.

  • Accessibility Supplier warrants that all Products will meet the requirements set forth in all federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules, and regulations applicable to accessibility of information technology for people with disabilities. Supplier agrees to use personnel trained and knowledgeable in supporting the needs of persons with disabilities in performance of Services under this Order.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Investigational Services This plan covers certain experimental or investigational services as described in this section. Clinical Trials This plan covers clinical trials as required under R.I. General Law § 27-20-60. An approved clinical trial is a phase I, phase II, phase III, or phase IV clinical trial that is being performed to prevent, detect or treat cancer or a life-threatening disease or condition. In order to qualify, the clinical trial must be: • federally funded; • conducted under an investigational new drug application reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); or • a drug trial that is exempt from having such an investigational new drug application. To qualify to participate in a clinical trial: • you must be determined to be eligible, according to the trial protocol; • a network provider must have concluded that your participation would be appropriate; and • medical and scientific information must have been provided establishing that your participation in the clinical trial would be appropriate. If a network provider is participating in a clinical trial, and the trial is being conducted in the state in which you reside, you may be required to participate in the trial through the network provider. Coverage under this plan includes routine patient costs for covered healthcare services furnished in connection with participation in a clinical trial. The amount you pay is based on the type of service you receive. Coverage for clinical trials does not include: • the investigational item, device, or service itself; • items or services provided solely to satisfy data collection and that are not used in the direct clinical management; or • a service that is clearly inconsistent with widely accepted standards of care.

  • Operational Manual (a) The Multiplex Licensee agrees to develop an operational manual in consultation with all Access Seekers to deal with technical and operational matters that arise under or in connection with this Agreement, or the supply of the Multiplex Transmission Service (Operational Manual).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.