Framework for Teaching Sample Clauses

Framework for Teaching.  Work with the Superintendent to assure horizontal and vertical continuity and articulation of the Academy’s special education program.  Review all new tests for their appropriateness based upon psychometric characteristics (e.g., validity, reliability, and standardization).  Monitor programs and services on a regular basis to assure compliance with current rules.  Develop and facilitate Child Study process.  May be assigned additional functions and responsibilities by the Superintendent.

Framework for Teaching. South Dakota’s Framework for Teaching is divided into four domains of teaching practice. Nested underneath the four domains are 22 components and 76 elements that identify the skills and knowledge associated with that domain. Figure 2 provides an overview of the full framework down to the component level, and an outline including important concepts is provided in the Appendix. Because of the overall depth, complexity, and length of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Framework for teaching, evaluators and staff are encouraged to visit the following sites as references to specifics on the framework. This also includes documents contained with the Teachscape platform. a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c. Setting Instructional Outcomes d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e. Designing Coherent Instruction f. Designing Student Assessments a. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport b. Establishing a Culture for Learning c. Managing Classroom Procedures d. Managing Student Behavior e. Organizing Physical Space a. Reflecting on Teaching b. Maintaining Accurate Records c. Communicating with Families d. Participating in a Professional Community e. Growing and Developing Professionally f. Showing Professionalism a. Communicating with Students b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c. Engaging Students in Learning d. Using Assessment in Instruction e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness State law and administrative rule requires that districts base professional practice evaluations on the South Dakota Framework for Teaching. Custer School District has the freedom to examine and select the components most critical to advancing district and school goals, provided that each evaluation contains at least one component from each domain.

Framework for Teaching. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation – Six (6) Components Domain 2: Classroom Environment – Five (5) Components Domain 3: Instruction – Five (5) Components Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities – Six (6) Components Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - Summative Evaluation Form Teacher’s Name: Evaluator’s Name: Teacher’s Name: Evaluator’s Name: Teacher’s Name: Evaluator’s Name: Excellent – At least half of the components of the Domain rated as Level 4, with the remaining components rated no lower than Level 3. Therefore, at least three (3) components in the Domain must be rated Level 4, with the remaining components being rated Level 3. Proficient – No more than one (1) component in the Domain rated as Level 2, with the remaining components rated as Level 3 or Level 4. Needs Improvement – More than one (1) component in the Domain rated as Level 2, with the remaining components rated as Level 3 or Level 4. Unsatisfactory – Any component rated as Level 1 Excellent – Excellent rating in two or more of the Domains, with the remaining Domains rated as Proficient. Proficient – No more than one (1) Domain rated as Needs Improvement, with the remaining domains rated as Proficient or Excellent. Needs Improvement – More than one (1) Domain rated as Needs Improvement, with the remaining Domains rated as Proficient or Excellent. Unsatisfactory – Any Domain rated as Unsatisfactory Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - Summative Evaluation Teacher’s Name: Evaluator’s Name: Two Goals Required Maximum of 3 Goals Teacher Selected Weight (totals 100%) Actual Outcome Rating (4 - 1) Multiply percentage by the rating of each goal. Goal #1 - Goal #2 - Total: Rating: Student Growth Rating: 4.0 - 3.5 = Excellent 3.4 - 2.5 = Proficient (Circle the Rating) 2.4 - 1.5 = Needs Improvement 1.4 - 1.0 = Unsatisfactory Professional Practice Rating: Excellent Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Calculation for Summative Evaluation Rating DISTRICT 58 ← Professional Practice Rating → Downers Grove Grade School District 58 - Summative Evaluation Teacher’s Name: Evaluator’s Name: School Year: