Final Action. An action of the FCC that has not been reversed, stayed, enjoined, set aside, annulled or suspended; with respect to which no timely petition for reconsideration or administrative or judicial appeal or sua sponte action of the FCC with comparable effect is pending and as to which the time for filing any such petition or appeal (administrative or judicial) or for the taking of any such sua sponte action of the FCC has expired.
Final Action. After considering any response from the employee, and considering any defenses or mitigating circumstances, the Deputy Fire Chief or designee will render a decision on the notice of proposed discipline. If the Deputy Fire Chief or designee imposes discipline, the employee has a right to appeal that decision as set forth in the grievance procedure, Section 18.2 of this MOU. Any decision to impose discipline will not be tolled pending resolution of the appeal.
Final Action. At the conclusion of the investigation of a Covered Incident, SFDA shall review and analyze all the evidence to determine whether the SFPD officer acted unlawfully. SFDA’s policies regarding crime charging are set forth in the 2016 CDAA Professionalism Manual, which states in part: The prosecutor should [file criminal charges] only if the following four (4) requirements are satisfied:
Final Action. Grievances not resolved within thirty (30) days following Level 1 may be submitted to the WFPD Board of Directors at its first regularly scheduled meeting following impasse at Level 2. The request for a hearing shall be delivered to the Fire Chief at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the next scheduled Board of Directors meeting (if 15 days notice can not be given due to mediation-conclusion date-provided such process takes no longer than 30 days - the grievant shall provide the 15-day notice before the following Board meeting). Having complied with the above, the grievant and/or his representative may present his case to the Board for settlement. Having heard all the information pertinent to the grievance from both parties, the Board may render its decision or take the matter under consideration until its next regularly scheduled meeting. Such decision, when rendered, shall be contained in the minutes of the Board’s meeting and shall be final and binding on the parties to this agreement. Grievances not submitted to the Board of Directors, or submitted outside the time limits established herein, shall be resolved in accordance with the Fire Chief’s decision at Level 1. The Board of Directors shall have the right to set any hearing coming before it at such time and location, as the directors may deem appropriate and in the best interest of the Department.
Final Action. The Tribunal, after completing its own inquiry, will formulate recommendations to be carried out by the VPAD. If the allegations are substantiated, then the areas to be considered in making the recommendations should include the need to do the following (with due regard to the relative seriousness of the misconduct or methodological error identified by the Tribunal): 1. withdraw all pending involved abstracts, articles, books and papers; 2. notify editors of journals in which the research involved was reported; 3. notify all collaborators and professional associates, as well as institutions with which the individual(s) had been previously affiliated and where there is reason to believe the validity of previous research might be questionable; 4. notify provincial licensing and certification boards; 5. notify professional societies; 6. notify sponsoring and funding agents; 7. redefine the status of those involved in the misconduct, which may include (1) removal from a particular project, (2) a letter of reprimand, (3) special monitoring of future work,
Final Action. After legally required publication of notice of public hearing, after filing required information with the various taxing units potentially affected by the designation of the economic revitalization area, and after conducting a public hearing pursuant to such notice, the Elkhart County Council hereby takes "final action," as that phrase is defined in I.C. 6- 1.1-12.1-2.5, with regard to the aforesaid Application of Chinook and the adoption of Resolution No. CC-2017-09 on June 10, 2017.
Final Action. EPA is approving portions of revisions to the SIP submitted on May 13, 2005, by the State of Texas for the DFW nonattainment area. We are approving the 2002 base year EI; emissions reductions from energy efficiency measures; an April 9, 2003, federal consent decree and subsequent amendments thereto concerning the Alcoa Rockdale plant in Xxxxx County; and revisions to 30 TAC, Chapter 117, Control of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds, concerning stationary reciprocating IC engines operating within the DFW 8-hour ozone nonattainment area and incorporating these revisions into the Texas SIP. These revisions are consistent with the requirements of the Act and EPA’s regulations, guidance and policy. We are approving these rules under section 110 and part D of the Act and EPA’s regulations.
Final Action. (a) Applicant acknowledges and agrees that ordinarily, no final favorable action on the Application will occur until all Township Expenses have been paid.
Final Action. At the earlier of the completion of the comment period es- tablished under paragraph (c) or the re- ceipt of information provided by the Bank during such period, the Director shall determine whether to take the proposed action or actions that were the subject of the notice under para- graphs (a) or (b) of this section, after taking into consideration any informa- tion provided by the Bank. Such notice shall respond to any information sub- mitted by the Bank. Any final order that the Bank take action, refrain from action or comply with any other requirement that was the subject of a notice under paragraph (b) of this sec- tion shall take effect upon the Bank’s receipt of the notice required under this paragraph, unless a different effec- tive date is set forth in this notice, and shall remain in effect and binding on the Bank until terminated in writing by the Director or until any terms and conditions for termination, as set forth in the notice, have been met.
Final Action. Section 110(k)(3) of the Act states that the EPA may partially approve and partially disapprove a SIP submittal if we find that only a portion of the submittal meets the requirements of the Act. We find that the majority of the October 5, 2010 revision to the Texas SIP is approvable because the submitted rules are adopted and submitted in accordance with the CAA and are consistent with the EPA’s regulations regarding NSR and Minor NSR. Therefore, the EPA approves the following as a revision to the Texas SIP under section 110 and parts C and D of the CAA: • Substantive and non-substantive revisions to the General Definitions at 3 See 54 FR 27274, June 28, 1989. See also, EPA’s June 13, 1989, Guidance on Limiting Potential to Emit in New Source Permitting; EPA’s September 18, 1989, Response to the Request for Clarification of Policy Regarding the ‘‘Net Emissions Increase’’; EPA’s June 23, 1993, Memorandum on the Applicability of New Source Review Circumvention Guidance to 0X, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx; 75 FR 19570–71, April 15, 2010 (proposed rule); and 30 TAC Section 116.10, as initially adopted on June 17, 1998 and submitted on July 22, 1998 and revised through the October 5, 2010 submittal, with the exception of 30 TAC Section 116.10(9)(F). Note that 30 TAC Section 116.10(5)(F) has not been submitted or proposed for inclusion in the Texas SIP. • New section 30 TAC Section 116.17 establishing the definitions for the Minor NSR Qualified Facilities Program as adopted by the State on September 15, 2010 and submitted on October 5, 2010. • Substantive revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.116(e)(1)–(e)(11) creating the Texas Minor NSR Qualified Facilities Program as adopted by the State on September 15, 2010 and submitted on October 5, 2010. • New section 30 TAC Section 116.117 establishing the documentation and notification requirements for the Minor NSR Qualified Facilities Program as adopted by the State on September 15, 2010 and submitted on October 5, 2010. Note that 30 TAC Section 116.117(a)(4)(B) has not been submitted or proposed for inclusion in the Texas SIP. • Revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.311(a)(2), providing that revisions authorized under the Qualified Facilities Program are not subject the permit renewal provisions 4 under 30 TAC Section 116.311, as adopted by the State on June 17, 1998 and submitted on July 22, 1998; and further revised by the adoption of August 21, 2002 and submitted on September 4, 2002. • The SIP narrative titled ‘‘Revisions to the Sta...
