Feature extraction Sample Clauses

Feature extraction. This module is to extract the features from given images. (Price: USD 1M)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Feature extraction. This module refers to the process of selecting a subset of features to improve the overall performance by dimensionality reduction. (Price: USD 1.5M)
Feature extraction. Each group Ga, Gb, or Gc is then an m × n matrix. In our implementation m = 10,n = 6. To efficiently deliver the secret key to other devices, Xxxxx will send a feature repre- senting the block of the bit rather than the entire matrix. Due to the noise interference, CSI variations among Xxxxx and other close devices always exist. In TDS, we leverage the singular value decomposition (SVD) to solve this issue. SVD provides a convenient way to characterize a matrix. Each group G is expressed as Gm×n = Um×mΣˆm×nV T , cannot improve its guess of a bit based on the feature sent from Xxxxx.
Feature extraction. Capsules The activity vector consists of the activation value of each neuron that composes the capsule. The activity vectors extracted by capsules are the different point of view or representation of the image. Iterative Increased computational costs Training → Routing by agreement (aggregate and interpret entity parts) The Activity vectors (votes) provided by the capsules are used to compute the agreement among the capsules
Feature extraction. Microscopic cancer cell line images contain significant amount of oriented singularities. as a result we used di- rectional feature parameters constructed using the new vector product and the directional xxxx tree complex wavelet trans- form (DT-CWT) for image representation.
Feature extraction. Each group Ga, Gb, or Gc is then an m × n matrix. In (([ N ♩ − 1)n + j)th samples are put into one block. The number of blocks is about 2N/n. Using Intel 5300 NIC, each sample includes 30 CSI amplitude values from 30 subcarriers.3 Hence each block is a 30 × n matrix. To represent 0 and 1, we divide a block into two groups. In each block, we denote the measurements of the ith subcarri- er as Si, a vector including n values. An intuitive solution is our implementation m = 10, n = 6. To efficiently deliver the secret key to other devices, Xxxxx will send a feature repre- senting the block of the bit rather than the entire matrix. Due to the noise interference, CSI variations among Xxxxx and other close devices always exist. In TDS, we leverage the singular value decomposition (SVD) to solve this issue. SVD provides a convenient way to characterize a matrix. Each group G is expressed as Gm×n = Xx×xXˆx×xX X , 0 0 ˆ x×x to let G = {S1, S3, S5, .., S29} and G = {S2, S4, S6, .., S30}, 3Technically there are 56 subcarriers (52 data subcarriers and 4 pilots) for 802.11n, but the current CSI tool can only provide 30 of them. where the diagonal matrix Σ is uniquely determined by X. The diagonal elements of Xˆ, xˆ0, xˆ0, ..., σˆn (assuming n ≤ m), are called singular values. In TDS, we extract the feature from Σˆ to characterize each group. It is well known that Correlation coefficient 0 0.03 Ba Bb Bc Probability
Feature extraction. Each group Ga, Gb, or Gc is then an m × n matrix. In ((| N ∫ − 1)n + j)th samples are put into one block. The number of blocks is about 2N/n. Using Intel 5300 NIC, each sample includes 30 CSI amplitude values from 30 subcarriers.3 Hence each block is a 30 × n matrix. To represent 0 and 1, we divide a block into two groups. In each block, we denote the measurements of the ith subcarri- er as Si, a vector including n values. An intuitive solution is our implementation m = 10, n = 6. To efficiently deliver the secret key to other devices, Xxxxx will send a feature repre- senting the block of the bit rather than the entire matrix. Due to the noise interference, CSI variations among Xxxxx and other close devices always exist. In TDS, we leverage the singular value decomposition (SVD) to solve this issue. SVD provides a convenient way to characterize a matrix. Each group G is expressed as Gm×n = Xx×xXˆx×xX X , 0 0 ˆ x×x
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Feature extraction

  • Configuration The configuration for the Purchase Right Aircraft will be the Detail Specification for Model 767-3S2F aircraft at the revision level in effect at the time of the Supplemental Agreement. Such Detail Specification will be revised to include (i) changes required to obtain required regulatory certificates and (ii) other changes as mutually agreed upon by Boeing and Customer.

  • Design At no cost to SCE, Seller shall be responsible for:

  • Service Description The Parties will provide Common Channel Signaling (CCS) to one another via Signaling System 7 (SS7) network Interconnection, in accordance with prevailing industry standards. Use of a third party provider of SS7 trunks is permitted.

  • Integration; Modification This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the Company and the Executive regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements, whether oral or written, between them with respect to its subject matter. This Agreement may not be modified except by a written agreement signed by the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Company.

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • Upgrades If this copy of the Software is an upgrade from an earlier version of the Software, it is provided to you on a license exchange basis. You agree by your installation and use of such copy of the Software to voluntarily terminate your earlier XXXX and that you will not continue to use the earlier version of the Software or transfer it to another person or entity unless such transfer is pursuant to Section 3.

  • Project 3.01. The Recipient declares its commitment to the objectives of the Project. To this end, the Recipient shall carry out the Project in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the General Conditions.

  • Review Systems The Asset Representations Reviewer will maintain and utilize an electronic case management system to manage the Tests and provide systematic control over each step in the Review process and ensure consistency and repeatability among the Tests.

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.