Feasibility Study Report Clause Samples

Feasibility Study Report. Blue hydrogen as accelerator and pioneer for energy transition in the industry. (July). Retrieved from ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/en/financial Hers, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, T., ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, R., van de Water, S., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, C. (2018). Hydrogen Routes in The Netherlands. 56. Hydrogen Europe. (2017a). Green Heating and Cooling. Retrieved April 7, 2020, from ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/green-heating-and-cooling Hydrogen Europe. (2017b). Hydrogen Applications. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/hydrogen-applications ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2017). Looking Under the Hood of the Dutch Energy System. 0–84. Retrieved from ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2016). The Role of Oxygen and Hydrogen in Refining. NS Energy. (2019). Nuon Magnum Power Plant. Retrieved May 19, 2020, from ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/projects/nuon-magnum-power-plant/ Port of Rotterdam. (2015). ▇▇▇▇ joins waste to syngas project. Retrieved March 6, 2020, from ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/news-and-press-releases/port-joins-waste-to-syngas-project Port of Rotterdam. (2017). Port of Rotterdam: CO2 Neutral. Port of Rotterdam. (2020). Retrieved March 4, 2020, from ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en

Feasibility Study Report. The FSR will closely follow the Caltrans template for the development of a Project Study Report (PSR) typically prepared as a part of their Project Initiation Document (PID) phase. The team will develop a risk register for each of the near- term and long-term prioritized alternatives to be included as attachments in the Feasibility Study Report. The team will review potential high-risk issues that could impact quality, scope, cost, or schedule. Key attachments for the FSR will include: ⮚ Concept Alternatives Screening Analysis ⮚ Prioritized Alternatives Exhibits ⮚ Prioritized Alternatives Phasing Exhibits ⮚ Preliminary Traffic Study Technical Memorandum ⮚ Preliminary Environmental Study Technical Memorandum ⮚ Prioritized Alternatives Preliminary Cost Estimates ⮚ Preliminary Right of Way Exhibits ⮚ Preliminary Utility Conflict Exhibits ⮚ Public Engagement Summary Report ⮚ Risk Register • Feasibility Study Report (Draft/Final) • All deliverables to be submitted in pdf format only unless noted otherwise In addition to the assumptions included elsewhere, we have made the following assumptions: • All PDT meetings are assumed virtual • No hardcopy deliverables • SCTA will provide and pay cost for public meeting venues • Each public meeting will be up to ninety (90) minutes long • Meeting notification materials will be electronically distributed by SCTA and project partners and there will be no postage or printing costs • Zoom hosting platform for hybrid public meetings • Pop-up events will be up to four (4) hours long including setup and breakdown times • SCTA will provide branded tablecloths, banners, branded canopies and other agency-branded materials and giveaways for distribution ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ has prepared the following preliminary project schedule based on our understanding of the feasibility study and our experience ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 23 Half 2, 2023 with other similar studies. Our schedule assumes NTP from the SCTA in July of 2023 with completion of the feasibility study by December of 2024. The ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Team has the availability of resources and is committed to the SCTA to complete the feasibility study within the timelines shown on our schedule based on our understanding of the feasibility study and scope of work as outlined in this proposal. 1 FINAL DESIGN (PS&E) 70 days Fri 3/22/24 Mon 9/23/24 Fri 8/23/24 Fri 12/27/24 3/22 SR 12/▇▇▇▇▇▇ ROAD INTERCHANGE FEASIBILITY STUDY ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ FEE ESTIMATE FOR PROJECT SCOPE: SCTA - SR 12-▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇...

Feasibility Study Report. A draft Feasibility Study Report, prepared in a manner consistent with the NCP and Feasibility Study guidance, shall be submitted 90 days after EPA approves or modifies the Development and Initial Screening of Alternatives Report. After EPA approves or modifies the draft FS, a final FS shall be submitted by Respondents within 90 days. Locus FIGURE 2: Supplemental Remedial Investigation timeline. 2015 April May June July August September October November Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Scope of Work Task Work Days Begin End 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 6/1 6/8 6/15 6/22 6/29 7/6 7/13 7/20 7/27 8/3 8/10 8/17 8/24 8/31 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5/1 5/8 5/15 5/22 5/29 6/5 6/12 6/19 6/26 7/3 7/10 7/17 7/24 7/31 8/7 8/14 8/21 8/28 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/2 10/9 10/16 10/23 10/30 11/6 11/13 11/20 11/27 AOC-SOW Effective Date 1 4/13 4/13 ***WORK PREPARATION and FIELD SEASON Dates are calculated assuming an Effective Date of April 13, 2015. All dates shall be extended by one day for each day of a later Effective Date*** Site Visit 2 4/20 4/22 Document preparation 15 4/13 5/4 Agency Review (assumed) 5 5/5 5/12 Revision and submittal 5 5/13 5/20 Agency Approval (assumed) 5 5/21 5/28 Document preparation 30 4/23 6/4 Agency Review (assumed) 10 6/5 6/19 Revision and submittal 14 6/20 7/9 Agency Approval (assumed) 5 7/10 7/17 Misc. (trailer, layout) Roadway Improvements Bridge Repair permit equiv. & planning Baseline Investigation 5/25 6/8 6/8 6/15 6/15 7/13 4/22 5/20 5/25 6/8 4/28 4/28 5/25 7/11 10/31 10/31 5/25 6/8 10/31 10/31 7/18 7/25 8/31 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 11/6 11/13 11/20 11/27 Monthly Assessment Mob & prep Water management Waste charac. & mgmt.

Feasibility Study Report. Prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, the items below.

Feasibility Study Report. The Respondent shall prepare a draft FS report for each of the Sites for EPA’s review and comment. This report, as ultimately adopted or modified by EPA, provides a basis for remedy selection by EPA, the Forest Service, and DOI and documents the development and analysis of remedial alternatives. The Respondent shall refer to the RI/FS Guidance for an outline of the report format and the required report content. The Respondent shall prepare a final FS report for each of the Sites which satisfactorily addresses EPA and Support Agency comments. REFERENCES‌ EPA 1988. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Interim Final, October, 1988. EPA 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual. Interim Final, USEPA, December 1989. EPA 1991. Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance: Standard Default Exposure Factors, USEPA, 1991. EPA 1992. Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term. USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, publication 9285.7-081, 1992.

Feasibility Study Report. The Parties agree that the Feasibility Study Report raises but does not resolve certain issues related to the Project Plan. The Parties will undertake studies related to these issues, pursuant to the Application Study Plan (as approved by FERC) and may undertake further studies. These studies, and further negotiations, are necessary to resolve these issues before finalizing the Project Plan in the new license application. The Parties intend that the final Project Plan will be consistent with the Shared Objectives stated in this Second Amended Planning Agreement.

Feasibility Study Report. COMPANY will prepare a Feasibility Study Report for the intersection of Fabyan Parkway at IL 31. The Feasibility Study Report will include an evaluation of the existing roadway conditions and summarize the aforementioned analyses. The report will also include documentation of public involvement and ultimately be a starting point for the Phase I study. The following items will be included in the report: A. Existing Roadway Evaluation and Summary 1. Classification and Design Criteria/Designation 2. Cross Section Elements 3. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment B. Alternatives Analysis Summary C. Drainage Analysis Summary D. Environmental Evaluation Summary E. Public Involvement Summary

Feasibility Study Report. The feasibility to ascertain the viability of the project has been made by economic evaluation as detailed below: This is an operating mine, the technical aspects of the mine are covered elaborately in other paragraphs of Modifications in the approved mining plan, only economical evaluation is carried-out. Key determinants in the decision making process on economic feasibility include the current and predicted market value of the Limestone Mineral and the cost of production. Production cost mainly include expenditures related to mineral production and environmental management during mining operations. The cost of reclamation and closure are usually the most significant thought in the project life cycle. Consequently, the cost of environmental management during operations and its closure is considered at an early stage in mine planning, often during the project feasibility analysis. The details of capital and recurring expenditure are given below: Budget for proposed mining Activi-ties Area of investment Method of calculation Basics Expenses(In Lakh Rs.) Capital Investment 35.03 I Land 7.16 a. Land cost expenditure Rs. 3.00 lakh/ Ha. for Private land Area: 2.387 Ha. Non-Forest land. 7.16 b. Cost on relief and rehabilitation action plan Rehabilitation notrequired 0.00 c. Compensation to the land outstees No land outstees 0.00 d. Cost of acquiring Surface Rights 0.00 II. Mining 25.00 a. Cost for infrastructure & equipments Manual Mining 25.00 III. Environmental protection 1.37 a. Pollution Control 0.70 Plantation 258plants @Rs 50/- perplant 0.13 Construction of bund 245m @ 100/- 0.24 b. Monitoring 1.00

Feasibility Study Report. VHB will compile the results of each of the analyses described above into a comprehensive but understandable study report. Based on experience with similar projects, we expect that the report would be between 80 to 100 pages, exclusive of appendices, with up to 20 color figures. It is understood that the draft feasibility study will be prepared for review by the Town officials and project partners prior to its distribution to the public. A final report will be prepared after the public has had an opportunity to review and provide comment. The final feasibility study will be provided to Town officials prior to final publication. Up to eight (8) hard copies would be printed, and a PDF version suitable for posting on the internet would also be delivered.