Faculty Evaluation Report Sample Clauses
The Faculty Evaluation Report clause establishes the requirement for regular assessment and documentation of a faculty member's performance. Typically, this involves supervisors or committees reviewing teaching effectiveness, research contributions, and service activities, with the findings recorded in a formal report. This clause ensures that faculty performance is systematically monitored and provides a transparent basis for decisions related to promotion, tenure, or professional development.
Faculty Evaluation Report. Part I A set of official documents providing complete and valid information, including:
a. For a faculty member preparing an annual evaluation: – NMU Faculty Evaluation Processing Form (see Appendix A of the Agreement) – faculty information page (Faculty Information Report – Basic Data Form)
b. For a faculty member applying for promotion and/or tenure: – NMU Faculty Evaluation: Promotion and/or Tenure Processing Form (see Appendix A of the Agreement) – faculty information page (Faculty Information Report – Basic Data Form) – letter of appointment and/or Employment Agreement from the University – where appropriate, a position description listing duties and responsibilities – where appropriate, documentation outlining any changes in duties and responsibilities – if any of the above are not available, or otherwise deserve some commentary, the faculty member should include a page with appropriate explanation – table of contents covering the narrative in Part II, the Appendix to Part II (see Section 5.4.1.5.e), and the Backup Materials to Part II (see Section 5.4.1.5.f).
Faculty Evaluation Report. Part I A set of official documents providing complete and valid information, including:
a. For a faculty member preparing an annual evaluation: -NMU Faculty Evaluation Processing Form (see Appendix A of the Agreement) -Faculty Information Report – Basic Data Form (from Academic Affairs) -Letter of Appointment from the University
b. For a faculty member applying for promotion and/or tenure: -NMU Faculty Evaluation: Promotion and/or Tenure Processing Form (see appendix A of the Agreement) -Faculty Information Report – Basic Data Form (from Academic Affairs) -Letter of Appointment from the University -where appropriate, a position description listing duties and responsibilities -where appropriate, documentation outlining any changes in duties and responsibilities -department bylaws -if any of the above are not available, or otherwise deserve some commentary, the faculty member should include a page with appropriate explanation -table of contents covering the narrative in Part II, the Appendix to Part II (see Section 5.4.6.2.5), and the Backup Materials to Part II (see Section 5.4.6.2.6).
Faculty Evaluation Report. Part V
a. For evaluations not involving applications for promotion and/or tenure: When the department has completed its evaluation, the faculty member shall review the completed evaluation before it leaves the department and has the right to add any written comments or pertinent material, which shall be appended to the Part V form. The faculty member will then sign the Part V form. The faculty member's complete evaluation will then be forwarded by the department head to the ▇▇▇▇. The ▇▇▇▇ reviews the evaluation and may choose to write a statement addressing some or all of the issues raised in the evaluation materials consistent with Section 5.4.1.2 and Section 5.4.1.6 items (a) through (h). If the ▇▇▇▇ chooses to write a statement, it shall be attached to Part V form. The ▇▇▇▇ signs the Part V form, after which a complete copy is given to the faculty member who may respond to the ▇▇▇▇'▇ statement by September 15 (see Section 5.4.1.1.1). Additional copies will be distributed as follows: one (1) copy for the departmental personnel file, one (1) copy for the ▇▇▇▇'▇ personnel file, and one (1) copy for the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
b. For evaluations involving applications for promotion and/or tenure: When the department has completed its evaluation, the application is considered complete. No additional information or material shall be added. The faculty member has the right to review the completed evaluation and must sign the Part V form acknowledging the same. This prohibition about adding new material does not preclude any evaluation body/person from seeking to obtain information that would clarify material in the completed evaluation, including but not limited to asking the faculty member to provide that clarification in writing. Example: An evaluation body desires to know whether a publication was juried or not.
Should a question arise as to whether the information desired represents an attempt at clarification or seems to represent a desire for new information, the inquiring party should put the question to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs and to the Grievance Officer of the Association; the information request may not be pursued unless both agree that it is indeed a matter of clarification. Recommendations for tenure and/or promotion shall be forwarded with separate statements or arguments for tenure and/or promotion as described in Sections 5.5.8 and 5.5.9 of the Master Agreement. The faculty member applying fo...