EVALUATION POINTS Clause Samples
EVALUATION POINTS. The Evaluation Committee will evaluate responsive proposals and assign a score in each category, not to exceed the maximum allowed score for that category, as determined through the Offeror’s attention to the criteria, detailed in the following sections. The amount of discussion to be applied to each listed topic is an individual choice of the Offeror, however, discussion should be detailed enough to inform and educate the evaluators. Each Offeror’s Proposal will be scored based upon comparison of the information submitted in the Offeror’s proposal against the evaluation criteria outlined below. Item Evaluation Factor Points Possible
Section 1: Backbone Section 2: Last Mile Section 3. Internet B. EVALUATION PROCESS
1. All Offeror proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the mandatory specifications stated within the RFP. Proposals deemed non-responsive will be eliminated from further consideration.
2. The Procurement Manager may contact the Offeror for clarification of the response.
3. The Evaluation Committee may use other sources of information to perform the evaluation.
4. Responsive proposals will be evaluated on the factors in Section 5 that have been assigned a point value. The responsible Offeror(s) whose proposal is most advantageous to the PSFA, taking into consideration the evaluation factors in Section V., and successful negotiations, will be recommended for contract award. Please note, however, that a serious deficiency in the response to any one factor may be grounds for rejection regardless of overall score. In the event of oral presentations, responsible Offerors with the highest scores resulting from the written evaluations will be selected as finalist Offerors.
5. Points awarded from the oral presentations will be added to the previously assigned points from the written evaluations to attain final scores.
6. Ties in ranking shall be scored using the sum of the ranking places, divided by the number of firms in a tie. The following is an example of scoring for a first-place tie: Scoring Numerical Ranking Firm A Tie (1st + 2nd / 2) = 1.5 Firm B Tie (1st + 2nd / 2) = 1.5 Firm C 3rd = 3 A tie for first, at the end of the final rankings after the completion of short listing and interviews, shall be broken by a separate ranking by the committee members, only ranking the firms involved in the tie. If a tie still exists after ranking only the tied firms, the tie shall be broken by the chairman of the PSFA’s SEN Evaluation Committee. Table of ...
EVALUATION POINTS. QUESTION: Tab 4.h – We’ve made in excess of 3,500 placements over the past four years. Are you seeking the details, behind every placement or a sample of placements?
EVALUATION POINTS. When creating a response, lenders may create a blended response incorporating multiple discussion points if desired. EXIM suggests combining your response to part i with those for items ii, iv, v, and combining your response to item iii with that of item vi. We encourage you to provide any other information that you feel would be helpful. i Organizational and Ownership Structure We need to “know the customer” and understand the lender and related ownership structure (i.e. holding company). If privately-owned and substantially-owned by a few individuals, we will need detailed owner information. Most lenders provide bios of key individuals in the management chain (background on lender). ii Markets and Communities Served This can be a geographical area or state. iii Commercial Lending Operations Explain the lending portfolio’s size and customer base (i.e. commercial real estate, commercial and industrial).