Evaluation Input Sample Clauses

Evaluation Input. DIR shall have a meaningful opportunity to provide information to Service Provider with respect to DIR's evaluation of the performance of the Service Provider Account Manager and the other Key Service Provider Personnel and such evaluation shall be reasonably considered by Service Provider in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Input. Kraft shall have a meaningful opportunity to provide information to Supplier with respect to Kraft’s evaluation of the performance of the Supplier Account Executive and the other Key Supplier Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered and accorded substantial weight by Supplier in establishing the [ * * * ] and [ * * * ] of such individuals.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Input. TXU shall have an opportunity to conduct an annual review of the Vendor Account Executive and each of the other Key Vendor Personnel and an opportunity to provide meaningful information to Vendor with respect to TXU's evaluation of the performance of the Vendor Account Executive and the other Key Vendor Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered by Vendor in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals.
Sample 1
Evaluation Input. Triad shall have a meaningful opportunity to provide information to Supplier with respect to Triad’s evaluation of the performance of the Supplier Account Executive and the other Key Supplier Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered by Supplier in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals. At Triad’s request, Supplier shall provide Triad confirmation of Supplier’s compliance with this Section 8.3.
Sample 1
Evaluation Input. Oncor shall have an opportunity to conduct an annual review of the Vendor Account Executive and each of the other Key Vendor Personnel and an opportunity to provide meaningful information to Vendor with respect to Oncor's evaluation of the performance of the Vendor Account Executive and the other Key Vendor Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered by Vendor in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals.
Sample 1
Evaluation Input. Sears shall have a meaningful opportunity to provide information to CSC with respect to Sears’ evaluation of the performance of the CSC Account Executive and the other Key Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered and accorded substantial weight by CSC in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals.
Sample 1
Evaluation Input. Allegheny shall have a meaningful opportunity to provide information to Service Provider with respect to Allegheny’s evaluation of the performance of the Service Provider Account Manager and the other Key Service Provider Personnel and such evaluation shall be considered and accorded substantial weight by Service Provider in establishing the bonus and other compensation of such individuals.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation Input

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluations Formal written performance evaluations of each employee shall be carried out during the probationary period and not less than annually thereafter.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Evaluation Period Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis are time-limited and will terminate immediately upon the earlier of (i) the trial end date as specified in an Order Form or other document executed by the parties regarding such trial, or (ii) the start date of when Customer purchases a right to use such Services on a non-Trial Basis, or (iii) the date when QuoVadis terminates Customer’s right to use the Services on a Trial Basis (which QuoVadis may do at any time in its sole discretion). Customer must cease using the Services on a Trial Basis upon any such termination.

  • Evaluation Report 20.5.4.1 The summary evaluation report shall be prepared by the Faculty Evaluation Committee and administrative evaluator(s) and shall include each evaluator’s individual rating. The summary evaluation report shall take into account the results of each of the evaluation components (Section 20.5.3) in order to arrive at an overall rating. When the committee and the administrative evaluator(s) cannot reach an agreement as to the overall rating, the report must include written explanation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.